---
slug: glass-is-liquid
passed: 2026-10-14
by: the assay line (research/assay-line/cited-1014b/), Codex fixer directed by claude-assaying-boyle-1014; source record by Codex, checked by Codex
checked: 201
confirmed: 61
wrong: 140
unverifiable: 0
observed: 0
stale: 0
---

This was the directed correction pass for glass-is-liquid at f5e5f84f34, using the 141-item cited-1014b triage after re-reading the cited evidence and the original layer code. It fixes 135 WRONG and five MINOR items, rejects X2 on evidence, and carries forward all 60 checker-confirmed entries at the supported scope, using the revised wording where a confirmed entry overlapped a correction. The 108 cold dial readings are individual claims but share one program branch. MINOR entries count in wrong here and have no public correction lines. Historical claim text preserves punctuation as literal escapes where needed; it is not an assertion that the old wording remains true.

## Claims

- MINOR | Every number is recomputed in front of you; | git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X1 [every-number-live]. Re-read evidence E01.
- CONFIRMED | the materials physicist Mark Ediger | https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-fiction-glass-liquid/; https://experts.news.wisc.edu/experts/mark-ediger | X2 [ediger-description]. Re-read evidence E02. The UW profile identifies glasses, physical and mechanical properties of materials, and a polymer-physics award. The interview calls Ediger a chemistry professor. These are compatible with a description of his research field. REJECTED: the departmental title does not contradict the field description. Leave the description and quotation unchanged.
- WRONG | Viscosity (vertical, logarithmic, from water at the bottom to cold window glass far off the top) against temperature (horizontal, from room temperature on the left to a glass furnace on the right). | git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X3 [graph-axes]. Re-read evidence E03.
- WRONG | Above the glass transition \u2014 the vertical line near 560 °C \u2014 the glass is a true equilibrium liquid and the curve is measured. | https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/78a/jresv78an4p497_a1b.pdf; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X4 [transition-560]. Re-read evidence E04.
- WRONG | the glass is a true equilibrium liquid and the curve is measured. | https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/78a/jresv78an4p497_a1b.pdf; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X5 [curve-is-measured]. Re-read evidence E04.
- WRONG | To the left of that line the glass has frozen; its room-temperature viscosity (the marker low-left) is an extrapolation, and that very uncertainty is the heart of the flow debate. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X6 [room-extrapolation]. Re-read evidence E05.
- WRONG | its room-temperature viscosity (the marker low-left) is an extrapolation | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X7 [room-marker-location]. Re-read evidence E05.
- WRONG | a windowpane was cut from a disc that a glassblower spun out by hand: a blob of molten glass on the end of a rod, flared open and whirled until centrifugal force flung it into a wide, wavy crown | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | X8 [crown-process]. Re-read evidence E06.
- MINOR | thick and lumpy near the central "bull's-eye," thinning toward the rim. | https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/JCE1989p0994.pdf | X9 [crown-thickness]. Re-read evidence E07.
- WRONG | Every pane cut from such a disc came out wedge-shaped. | https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/JCE1989p0994.pdf | X10 [every-pane-wedge]. Re-read evidence E08.
- WRONG | Drag the disc to cut a pane, then choose how it was hung. | git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X11 [drag-disc]. Re-read evidence E09.
- WRONG | Right: that pane seen edge-on, hung in the orientation you chose. | git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X12 [edge-on-view]. Re-read evidence E10.
- WRONG | But conservators who have surveyed real medieval windows (Robert Brill, of the Corning Museum of Glass) report panes installed with the thick edge at the top and the sides too, not only the bottom. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | X13 [brill-survey-top-sides]. Re-read evidence E11.
- WRONG | In 2017 a team led by Ozgur Gulbiten and John Mauro measured the viscosity of actual medieval glass taken from Westminster Abbey and computed how far it could creep. | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/mrs-bulletin/article/shattering-the-myth-of-fastflowing-medieval-glass/397C171170F2EBB42047E230D2E47B87; https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | X14 [2017-team-actual-glass]. Re-read evidence E12.
- WRONG | Over the eight centuries a real cathedral window has stood, that works out to under a millionth of a single atom's diameter. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | X15 [eight-centuries-millionth]. Re-read evidence E13.
- WRONG | "Technically nonzero" and "thick at the bottom you can see" are separated by some thirty orders of magnitude. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | X16 [thirty-orders]. Re-read evidence E14.
- MINOR | The verifier recomputes everything the page asserts and confirms: | git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | X17 [verifier-everything]. Re-read evidence E15.
- WRONG | the room-temperature viscosity is taken from measurement instead. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | X18 [room-measurement]. Re-read evidence E16.
- WRONG | Sag time τ = η/(ρgh) for a 3 mm pane (ρ = 2500, g = 9.81): ≈ 1 s at 1200 °C, ≈ 550 yr at Tg, and ≈ 4×10¹⁰ yr at room temperature using the most generous cited viscosity (10²⁰ Pa·s) \u2014 already longer than the universe has existed. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; https://glassproperties.com/viscosity/Glass-Viscosity-Fixpoints.htm; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | X19 [sag-ladder]. Re-read evidence E17.
- WRONG | the most generous cited viscosity (10²⁰ Pa·s) | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; https://glassproperties.com/viscosity/Glass-Viscosity-Fixpoints.htm; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | X20 [lowest-cited-viscosity]. Re-read evidence E17.
- WRONG | Scientific American, "Fact or Fiction?: Glass Is a (Supercooled) Liquid" (Ediger; Brill on ancient vessels and on panes thick at top/sides). | https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-fiction-glass-liquid/ | X21 [citation-sciam]. Re-read evidence E11.
- WRONG | Ediger; Brill on ancient vessels and on panes thick at top/sides | https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-fiction-glass-liquid/ | X22 [sciam-brill-orientations]. Re-read evidence E11.
- MINOR | this page computes its viscosity from molten to cold | git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X23 [plain-computes-viscosity]. Re-read evidence E01.
- WRONG | The old panes are uneven because they were spun by hand. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | X24 [plain-hand-spun]. Re-read evidence E06.
- WRONG | old cathedral panes are uneven because of the hand-spinning that made them, and some are thicker at the top. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | X25 [meta-old-spun-tops]. Re-read evidence E06.
- MINOR | Every number recomputed live; 16/16 checks green. | git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X26 [meta-every-number]. Re-read evidence E01.
- WRONG | which is itself why "glass flows at room temperature" is wrong | https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/CathedralGlasses.pdf | X27 [body-invalid-model-conclusion]. Re-read evidence E18.
- WRONG | with the room-temperature value taken from measurement | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | X28 [body-measured-room]. Re-read evidence E16.
- WRONG | Pressure doesn't melt the ice under a skate | https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/penn-engineering-why-are-icy-surfaces-slippery | X29 [neighbor-pressure-ice]. Re-read evidence E19.
- WRONG | pourable, workable glass. It really does flow here. | https://glassproperties.com/viscosity/Glass-Viscosity-Fixpoints.htm; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X30 [state-liquid]. Re-read evidence E20.
- WRONG | frozen glass, hundreds of degrees below where it could flow. | git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X31 [state-solid]. Re-read evidence E21.
- WRONG | 20°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X32 [dial-20]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 20 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 555°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X33 [dial-555]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 555 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | from water at the bottom to cold window glass far off the top | git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X34 [graph-viscosity-comparators]. Re-read evidence E03.
- WRONG | 25°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X35 [dial-25]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 25 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 30°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X36 [dial-30]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 30 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 35°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X37 [dial-35]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 35 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 40°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X38 [dial-40]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 40 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 45°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X39 [dial-45]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 45 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 50°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X40 [dial-50]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 50 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 55°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X41 [dial-55]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 55 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 60°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X42 [dial-60]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 60 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 65°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X43 [dial-65]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 65 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 70°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X44 [dial-70]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 70 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 75°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X45 [dial-75]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 75 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 80°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X46 [dial-80]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 80 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 85°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X47 [dial-85]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 85 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 90°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X48 [dial-90]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 90 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 95°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X49 [dial-95]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 95 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 100°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X50 [dial-100]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 100 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 105°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X51 [dial-105]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 105 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 110°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X52 [dial-110]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 110 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 115°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X53 [dial-115]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 115 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 120°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X54 [dial-120]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 120 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 125°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X55 [dial-125]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 125 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 130°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X56 [dial-130]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 130 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 135°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X57 [dial-135]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 135 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 140°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X58 [dial-140]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 140 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 145°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X59 [dial-145]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 145 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 150°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X60 [dial-150]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 150 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 155°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X61 [dial-155]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 155 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 160°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X62 [dial-160]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 160 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 165°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X63 [dial-165]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 165 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 170°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X64 [dial-170]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 170 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 175°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X65 [dial-175]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 175 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 180°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X66 [dial-180]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 180 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 185°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X67 [dial-185]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 185 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 190°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X68 [dial-190]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 190 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 195°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X69 [dial-195]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 195 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 200°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X70 [dial-200]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 200 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 205°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X71 [dial-205]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 205 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 210°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X72 [dial-210]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 210 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 215°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X73 [dial-215]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 215 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 220°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X74 [dial-220]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 220 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 225°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X75 [dial-225]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 225 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 230°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X76 [dial-230]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 230 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 235°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X77 [dial-235]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 235 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 240°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X78 [dial-240]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 240 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 245°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X79 [dial-245]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 245 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 250°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X80 [dial-250]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 250 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 255°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X81 [dial-255]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 255 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 260°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X82 [dial-260]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 260 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 265°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X83 [dial-265]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 265 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 270°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X84 [dial-270]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 270 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 275°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X85 [dial-275]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 275 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 280°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X86 [dial-280]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 280 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 285°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X87 [dial-285]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 285 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 290°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X88 [dial-290]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 290 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 295°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X89 [dial-295]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 295 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 300°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X90 [dial-300]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 300 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 305°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X91 [dial-305]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 305 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 310°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X92 [dial-310]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 310 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 315°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X93 [dial-315]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 315 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 320°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X94 [dial-320]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 320 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 325°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X95 [dial-325]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 325 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 330°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X96 [dial-330]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 330 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 335°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X97 [dial-335]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 335 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 340°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X98 [dial-340]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 340 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 345°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X99 [dial-345]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 345 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 350°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X100 [dial-350]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 350 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 355°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X101 [dial-355]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 355 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 360°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X102 [dial-360]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 360 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 365°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X103 [dial-365]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 365 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 370°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X104 [dial-370]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 370 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 375°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X105 [dial-375]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 375 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 380°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X106 [dial-380]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 380 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 385°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X107 [dial-385]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 385 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 390°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X108 [dial-390]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 390 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 395°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X109 [dial-395]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 395 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 400°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X110 [dial-400]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 400 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 405°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X111 [dial-405]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 405 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 410°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X112 [dial-410]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 410 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 415°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X113 [dial-415]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 415 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 420°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X114 [dial-420]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 420 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 425°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X115 [dial-425]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 425 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 430°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X116 [dial-430]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 430 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 435°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X117 [dial-435]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 435 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 440°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X118 [dial-440]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 440 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 445°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X119 [dial-445]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 445 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 450°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X120 [dial-450]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 450 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 455°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X121 [dial-455]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 455 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 460°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X122 [dial-460]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 460 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 465°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X123 [dial-465]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 465 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 470°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X124 [dial-470]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 470 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 475°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X125 [dial-475]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 475 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 480°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X126 [dial-480]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 480 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 485°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X127 [dial-485]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 485 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 490°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X128 [dial-490]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 490 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 495°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X129 [dial-495]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 495 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 500°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X130 [dial-500]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 500 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 505°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X131 [dial-505]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 505 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 510°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X132 [dial-510]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 510 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 515°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X133 [dial-515]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 515 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 520°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X134 [dial-520]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 520 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 525°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X135 [dial-525]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 525 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 530°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X136 [dial-530]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 530 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 535°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X137 [dial-535]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 535 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 540°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X138 [dial-540]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 540 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 545°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X139 [dial-545]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 545 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | 550°C \u2014 FROZEN, viscosity ≈ 10^20–10^22 Pa·s (measured) \u2014 sag time > 3.1× the age of the universe | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | X140 [dial-550]. Re-read evidence E16. Baseline output reproduced at 550 C; final setting checked by research/glass-is-liquid/verify-page.mjs.
- WRONG | (added) glass at Tg is ~23 orders of magnitude stiffer than honey | git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs; https://artwaste.land/checks/research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | X141 [added-reader-honey-comparison]. Re-read evidence E22.
- CONFIRMED | The slow-liquid explanation for old windows circulates among teachers and popular accounts. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [myth-circulation]. Brill recounts the story and repeated textbook and museum inquiries; no statistical popularity ranking is claimed.
- CONFIRMED | The explanation that old windows visibly flowed thicker at the bottom is false. | https://info.cmog.org/node/631 | C [myth-not-true]. Corning attributes the varying thickness to manufacture.
- CONFIRMED | At room temperature, window glass is an amorphous solid hundreds of degrees below its glass transition. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [solid-and-temperature]. Brill supports rigidity; the FAQ places the modern soda-lime transition near 550 C. The revised wording avoids an absolute prohibition on every possible flow process.
- CONFIRMED | Ordinary window glass is made from a silica-based melt cooled without crystallizing. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [sand-soda-melting]. The FAQ describes soda/lime additions and the arrested disordered state; this is not a recipe for every glass.
- CONFIRMED | Glass lacks the regular repeating atomic arrangement of a crystal. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [atoms-and-lattice]. Brill distinguishes atomic disorder from rigidity.
- CONFIRMED | Glass is described as an amorphous solid. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [amorphous-state]. The FAQ uses this term for a disordered but rigid material.
- CONFIRMED | Window glass at room temperature is rigid. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [rigid]. Brill supports this ordinary material description.
- CONFIRMED | Ediger says, "if you grab it, it holds its shape." | https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-fiction-glass-liquid/ | C [ediger-quote]. The interview attributes those words to Ediger. The quotation is unchanged.
- CONFIRMED | Ordinary cooled glass retains a structure resembling its liquid precursor. | https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/through-thin-film-glass-researchers-spot-new-liquid-phase | C [liquid-origin-structure]. The Penn research account distinguishes liquid-like structure from solid-like properties.
- CONFIRMED | Many consider supercooled liquid an unfortunate name for glass. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [supercooled-misnomer]. The FAQ conclusion explicitly discusses this terminology.
- CONFIRMED | Viscosity measures resistance to flow and changes with temperature. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [viscosity-definition]. Brill defines viscosity and describes the changes during cooling.
- CONFIRMED | The hot curve uses a predictive VFT model for a soda-lime composition. | https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/78a/jresv78an4p497_a1b.pdf | C [vft-real-glass]. Lyon Appendix B supplies this example; its predictive provenance is corrected under X4/X5.
- CONFIRMED | Cooling glass increases viscosity by many orders of magnitude. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [twenty-orders]. The original twenty-something comparison mixed composition-specific estimates. The revised general wording avoids implying one measured cooling trajectory.
- CONFIRMED | The page model gives a characteristic time of about one second at 1200 C. | https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/78a/jresv78an4p497_a1b.pdf | C [1200-liquid]. Lyon constants give eta=75.2830085 Pa s; division by 73.575 Pa gives 1.02321452 seconds. This is model arithmetic.
- CONFIRMED | The medieval-composition study supports no perceptible room-temperature flow over human history. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [cold-frozen]. Its model conclusion supports this scope. The page's universal universe-age bound is separately corrected under X19/X20.
- CONFIRMED | The universe is approximately 13.8 billion years old. | https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanets/what-is-the-universe/ | C [universe-age]. NASA gives that approximate age.
- CONFIRMED | The float-glass process was announced in 1959. | https://www.pilkington.com/en-us/united-states-and-canada/about-us/pilkington-history/invention-of-float-glass | C [float-date]. Pilkington identifies 20 January 1959 as the announcement, after earlier development.
- CONFIRMED | Resting a heavy pane edge at the bottom is a plausible reconstruction of practice. | https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/JCE1989p0994.pdf | C [heavy-edge-practice]. Plumb proposes this while noting the absence of the historical instruction book that could resolve it.
- CONFIRMED | Downward flow would not explain the thick edge at the top of the schematic pane. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [downward-flow-orientation]. This is the limited directional inference, not a count of old windows. X13 removes the survey claim.
- CONFIRMED | Downward flow does not explain a thick upper edge. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [top-pane-inference]. The inference is limited to direction; actual orientation evidence remains secondhand in Brill.
- CONFIRMED | An uneven manufactured pane can be hung with its thick edge in different directions. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | C [manufacture-all-orientations]. This describes the schematic possibilities, not documented installation frequencies.
- CONFIRMED | Brill supplies an anecdote and fragment observations, not an orientation survey. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [orientation-survey-caveat]. The original stronger caveat is corrected under X13; only this limited scope is confirmed.
- CONFIRMED | The 2017 study calculates a maximum flow of about 1 nm over a billion years. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [nanometre-billion-years]. The abstract gives this model result; it is not an observed displacement.
- CONFIRMED | One nanometre is a few atomic diameters at the page's illustrative 0.3 nm scale. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | C [atomic-size-comparison]. The ratio is about 3.3; the scale is a comparison, not a universal atom size. The verifier supplies the explicit diameter.
- CONFIRMED | The study infers viscosity about 16 orders below one previous soda-lime study. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [2017-lower-viscosity]. The abstract makes this specific comparison, not a minimum over all published estimates.
- CONFIRMED | The study still predicts no measurable viscous flow on human timescales. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [still-no-flow]. This is the abstract's conclusion. Most-generous-measurement wording is removed under X14 and X19/X20.
- CONFIRMED | Zanotto's 1998 relaxation-time estimate exceeds the universe's age. | https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/CathedralGlasses.pdf | C [zanotto-age-universe]. The paper's approximate estimate uses a separate low-temperature argument; it does not validate the page's former cold band.
- CONFIRMED | Brill reports older Egyptian, Hellenistic and Roman glass without the alleged sagging. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [ancient-vessels]. The examples concern the appearance of surviving objects, not proof of zero atomic motion.
- CONFIRMED | Some surviving Roman glass is nearly 2000 years old. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [roman-2000]. The FAQ discusses First Century objects and the Portland Vase.
- CONFIRMED | The old-vessel evidence weighs against appreciable flow under ordinary historical conditions. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [puddling-inference]. Brill uses the survival of delicate ancient objects as an argument; this is not a universal theorem about glass.
- CONFIRMED | The Penn liquid-phase research concerns engineered nanometre-scale glass films. | https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/through-thin-film-glass-researchers-spot-new-liquid-phase | C [penn-thin-film]. The university research account describes vapor deposition and thin films, not cathedral panes.
- CONFIRMED | log10(eta in poise)=A+B/(T-T0), with A=-1.594, B=4111.7 and T0=280.3 C. | https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/78a/jresv78an4p497_a1b.pdf | C [vft-formula-constants]. Lyon Appendix B supplies the constants and equation in Celsius and poise.
- CONFIRMED | The chosen fixed-point viscosities give about 1015, 728, 562 and 536 C in this model. | https://glassproperties.com/viscosity/Glass-Viscosity-Fixpoints.htm | C [standard-fixed-points]. The table defines the viscosity levels; substituting them in Lyon's formula gives those temperatures. They are composition-specific.
- CONFIRMED | The page uses approximately 1e12 Pa s as its glass-transition reference. | https://glassproperties.com/viscosity/Glass-Viscosity-Fixpoints.htm | C [tg-definition]. The fixed-point table includes this viscosity within the transition range; the chosen 560 C is approximate.
- CONFIRMED | tau=eta/(rho*g*h) is a characteristic time, not a precise prediction of a pane's shape. | git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs | C [sag-model-scope]. The standalone code gives this explicit model and caveat. Corrected cold inputs give billions to trillions of years.
- CONFIRMED | Zanotto, Do cathedral glasses flow?, Am. J. Phys. 66, 392 (1998). | https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/CathedralGlasses.pdf | C [citation-zanotto]. The paper header and the later study's bibliography identify this citation.
- CONFIRMED | Zanotto and Gupta, Additional remarks, Am. J. Phys. 67, 260 (1999). | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [citation-gupta]. The 2017 study bibliography lists pages 260-262.
- CONFIRMED | Gulbiten and colleagues, Viscous flow of medieval cathedral glass, online 2017; volume 101, 2018, DOI 10.1111/jace.15092. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [citation-gulbiten]. The publisher records first publication on 21 July 2017 and the January 2018 issue.
- CONFIRMED | The study calculates a maximum near 1 nm per billion years and a 16-order difference from a previous study. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [citation-flow-summary]. Confirmed with model and comparison scope stated in the revised citation.
- CONFIRMED | Corning has a FAQ about whether glass continues to flow at room temperature. | https://info.cmog.org/node/631 | C [citation-corning]. The retrieved page has that question as its heading.
- CONFIRMED | The Physics FAQ hosted by Baez discusses a 1e22 Pa s extrapolation and Roman glass. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [citation-baez]. The authorship header identifies Gibbs and Watts; Baez identifies the hosting collection.
- CONFIRMED | The FAQ reports a room-temperature extrapolation of about 1e22 Pa s and ancient Roman examples. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [baez-room-roman]. Types of Glass contains both. It does not call the extrapolation a direct measurement.
- CONFIRMED | The cited Fulcher constants belong to Lyon's 1974 predictive example. | https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/78a/jresv78an4p497_a1b.pdf | C [citation-fulcher]. The NBS paper supplies the exact numerical constants; the source annotation now names Lyon.
- CONFIRMED | Fluegel's viscosity model at glassproperties.com is a real separate model. | https://glassproperties.com/viscosity/ | C [citation-fluegel]. The researcher's page describes the statistical model. The revised page cites Lyon for its constants rather than conflating the two.
- CONFIRMED | Room-temperature viscosity estimates depend on composition and thermal history. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [room-composition-uncertainty]. The medieval-composition abstract states that dependence. The revised page labels its inputs as estimates.
- CONFIRMED | Thick-edge-down practice is presented as plausible rather than a documented medieval rule. | https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/JCE1989p0994.pdf | C [practice-reconstruction]. Plumb's proposed explanation supports this limited status.
- CONFIRMED | The consulted Brill account does not give a count of installation orientations. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [no-single-orientation-count]. This is a statement about that account only; X13 corrects the former stronger wording.
- CONFIRMED | Terminology for the glassy state remains a subject of discussion. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [glass-classification-debate]. The FAQ discusses solid, liquid and separate-state descriptions while retaining the macroscopic rigidity distinction.
- CONFIRMED | The cited accounts reject visible historical window deformation caused by glass flow. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [every-source-agrees]. This confirms the page's historical-timescale context, not an assertion of exactly zero relaxation.
- CONFIRMED | Window glass is rigid on human timescales and old pane unevenness comes from manufacture. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [footer-conclusions]. Brill supports the narrow conclusion; the wording allows both crown and cylinder manufacture.
- CONFIRMED | Room-temperature glass flow does not explain the uneven thickness of old cathedral windows. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [plain-cold-flow]. The medieval-composition study's flow calculation supports the historical-timescale conclusion.
- CONFIRMED | Brill relays a secondhand remark about top-thick and bottom-thick panes. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [dek-tops]. Only the anecdote is confirmed. Its stronger use as direct installation evidence is removed under X13 and X25.
- CONFIRMED | A study of a typical medieval composition calculates a maximum flow of about 1 nm per billion years. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 | C [dek-real-creep]. The corrected dek describes a newly made sample and a calculated maximum; X14 corrects the artifact provenance.
- CONFIRMED | Room-temperature window glass is hundreds of degrees below its transition and behaves as a rigid solid. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf | C [meta-no-flow]. Confirmed at this scope. The revised metadata avoids claiming an absolute flow prohibition.
- CONFIRMED | The relation note's rough twenty-order comparison concerns cold glass versus workable hot glass. | https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092; https://glassproperties.com/viscosity/Glass-Viscosity-Fixpoints.htm | C [neighbor-glass-twenty-orders]. The study gives 1e24 to 1e25 Pa s; the working-point table gives 1e3 Pa s, a 21-22 order comparison. It is not a universal threshold for any motion.
- CONFIRMED | The far tidal bulge can be explained by differential gravitational acceleration. | https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/ocean/tides | C [neighbor-tide]. NOAA subtracts the Moon's pull at Earth's centre from the near and far side pulls, supporting the note's rejection of centrifugal flinging as required cause.
- CONFIRMED | Concrete hardens through reaction with water rather than drying alone. | https://www.cement.org/cement-concrete/cement-concrete-faq/ | C [neighbor-concrete]. The association FAQ says hydraulic-cement concrete hardens underwater. The teaser is read in its hardening context, not as denying later moisture loss.
- CONFIRMED | Near the chosen glass transition the model gives very slow characteristic flow. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html | C [state-stiffening]. The FAQ supports high viscosity near transition; the page now explicitly labels this as a model result.
- CONFIRMED | Hanging the heavy edge at the bottom is a plausible choice. | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/JCE1989p0994.pdf | C [orientation-bottom]. Plumb supports this reconstruction, without an installation-frequency survey.
- CONFIRMED | The schematic pane can be hung thick-edge at the top. | https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html | C [orientation-top]. The control demonstrates this. Brill's historical statement is secondhand, so the former found-in-real-windows label is removed under X13.

## Findings

- [fixed] X1 [every-number-live]: Describe live hot-model calculations and separately sourced cold estimates; narrow metadata and plain-language copies. No public line for MINOR. Evidence E01.
- [fixed] X3 [graph-axes]: Correct the graph caption to put the room estimates inside the plot near the upper left. Evidence E03; public correction 1.
- [fixed] X4 [transition-560]: Identify Lyon and the predictive calculation in the caption, check, source list, Markdown and verifier comments. Evidence E04; public correction 2.
- [fixed] X5 [curve-is-measured]: Identify Lyon and the predictive calculation in the caption, check, source list, Markdown and verifier comments. Evidence E04; public correction 2.
- [fixed] X6 [room-extrapolation]: Replace the false lower-left locator and retain the estimate qualification. Evidence E05; public correction 1.
- [fixed] X7 [room-marker-location]: Replace the false lower-left locator and retain the estimate qualification. Evidence E05; public correction 1.
- [fixed] X8 [crown-process]: Allow crown and cylinder methods in the history, dek, plain text, social descriptions, JSON-LD, Markdown body and verifier comments. Evidence E06; public correction 3.
- [fixed] X9 [crown-thickness]: Describe variable thickness and label the existing colour gradient as a schematic. No public line for MINOR. Evidence E07.
- [fixed] X10 [every-pane-wedge]: Replace the universal wedge claim with panes that can inherit unevenness, including nearly uniform areas. Evidence E08; public correction 4.
- [fixed] X11 [drag-disc]: Describe the fixed cut and the working orientation buttons; do not advertise dragging. Evidence E09; public correction 5.
- [fixed] X12 [edge-on-view]: Call it a schematic pane with colour representing thickness; remove unused edge-profile variables and inaccurate comments. Evidence E10; public correction 6.
- [fixed] X13 [brill-survey-top-sides]: Narrow the history and source annotation; make top/side control text explicitly schematic; remove unsupported survey claims from the dek and JSON-LD. Evidence E11; public correction 7.
- [fixed] X14 [2017-team-actual-glass]: Replace the removed-artifact story with a newly made composition-matched sample; distinguish measurements from room-temperature model results. Evidence E12; public correction 8.
- [fixed] X15 [eight-centuries-millionth]: Use about 2.7 millionths and retain that this is a scaled maximum; add the numerical assertion. Evidence E13; public correction 9.
- [fixed] X16 [thirty-orders]: Replace thirty orders with 12.1 orders relative to an explicit 1 mm benchmark; assert the calculation. Evidence E14; public correction 10.
- [fixed] X17 [verifier-everything]: Limit the check introduction to the listed model quantities and comparisons. No public line for MINOR. Evidence E15.
- [fixed] X18 [room-measurement]: At 20 C label the separately cited 1e19 and 1e22 inputs as estimates; at 25 through 555 C withhold viscosity and flow-time estimates. Remove the false cold marker and below-transition curve; update labels, prose and verifier comments. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X19 [sag-ladder]: Correct the adopted low input, all age-of-universe lower-bound claims and the honey comparison; verify the unit conversion and both characteristic times. Evidence E17; public correction 12.
- [fixed] X20 [lowest-cited-viscosity]: Correct the adopted low input, all age-of-universe lower-bound claims and the honey comparison; verify the unit conversion and both characteristic times. Evidence E17; public correction 12.
- [fixed] X21 [citation-sciam]: Narrow the history and source annotation; make top/side control text explicitly schematic; remove unsupported survey claims from the dek and JSON-LD. Evidence E11; public correction 7.
- [fixed] X22 [sciam-brill-orientations]: Narrow the history and source annotation; make top/side control text explicitly schematic; remove unsupported survey claims from the dek and JSON-LD. Evidence E11; public correction 7.
- [fixed] X23 [plain-computes-viscosity]: Describe live hot-model calculations and separately sourced cold estimates; narrow metadata and plain-language copies. No public line for MINOR. Evidence E01.
- [fixed] X24 [plain-hand-spun]: Allow crown and cylinder methods in the history, dek, plain text, social descriptions, JSON-LD, Markdown body and verifier comments. Evidence E06; public correction 3.
- [fixed] X25 [meta-old-spun-tops]: Allow crown and cylinder methods in the history, dek, plain text, social descriptions, JSON-LD, Markdown body and verifier comments. Evidence E06; public correction 3.
- [fixed] X26 [meta-every-number]: Describe live hot-model calculations and separately sourced cold estimates; narrow metadata and plain-language copies. No public line for MINOR. Evidence E01.
- [fixed] X27 [body-invalid-model-conclusion]: State the model limit in Markdown and verifier comments; ground the historical-timescale conclusion in separate estimates and old objects. Evidence E18; public correction 13.
- [fixed] X28 [body-measured-room]: At 20 C label the separately cited 1e19 and 1e22 inputs as estimates; at 25 through 555 C withhold viscosity and flow-time estimates. Remove the false cold marker and below-transition curve; update labels, prose and verifier comments. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X29 [neighbor-pressure-ice]: Qualify this layer's relation note and regenerate its local teaser to say pressure melting does not generally explain skating. Evidence E19; public correction 14.
- [fixed] X30 [state-liquid]: Label the hot branch as a model calculation and remove the blanket pourable/workable claim. Evidence E20; public correction 15.
- [fixed] X31 [state-solid]: Use a temperature-distance statement true at every cold setting: below the chosen 560 C transition. Evidence E21; public correction 15.
- [fixed] X32 [dial-20]: removed the false measured cold readout. Room estimates correctly labelled at 20 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X33 [dial-555]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 555 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X34 [graph-viscosity-comparators]: Correct the graph caption to put the room estimates inside the plot near the upper left. Evidence E03; public correction 1.
- [fixed] X35 [dial-25]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 25 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X36 [dial-30]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 30 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X37 [dial-35]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 35 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X38 [dial-40]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 40 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X39 [dial-45]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 45 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X40 [dial-50]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 50 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X41 [dial-55]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 55 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X42 [dial-60]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 60 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X43 [dial-65]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 65 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X44 [dial-70]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 70 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X45 [dial-75]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 75 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X46 [dial-80]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 80 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X47 [dial-85]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 85 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X48 [dial-90]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 90 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X49 [dial-95]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 95 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X50 [dial-100]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 100 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X51 [dial-105]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 105 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X52 [dial-110]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 110 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X53 [dial-115]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 115 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X54 [dial-120]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 120 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X55 [dial-125]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 125 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X56 [dial-130]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 130 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X57 [dial-135]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 135 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X58 [dial-140]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 140 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X59 [dial-145]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 145 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X60 [dial-150]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 150 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X61 [dial-155]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 155 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X62 [dial-160]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 160 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X63 [dial-165]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 165 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X64 [dial-170]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 170 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X65 [dial-175]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 175 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X66 [dial-180]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 180 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X67 [dial-185]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 185 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X68 [dial-190]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 190 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X69 [dial-195]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 195 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X70 [dial-200]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 200 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X71 [dial-205]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 205 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X72 [dial-210]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 210 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X73 [dial-215]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 215 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X74 [dial-220]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 220 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X75 [dial-225]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 225 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X76 [dial-230]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 230 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X77 [dial-235]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 235 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X78 [dial-240]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 240 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X79 [dial-245]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 245 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X80 [dial-250]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 250 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X81 [dial-255]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 255 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X82 [dial-260]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 260 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X83 [dial-265]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 265 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X84 [dial-270]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 270 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X85 [dial-275]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 275 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X86 [dial-280]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 280 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X87 [dial-285]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 285 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X88 [dial-290]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 290 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X89 [dial-295]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 295 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X90 [dial-300]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 300 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X91 [dial-305]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 305 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X92 [dial-310]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 310 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X93 [dial-315]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 315 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X94 [dial-320]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 320 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X95 [dial-325]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 325 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X96 [dial-330]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 330 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X97 [dial-335]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 335 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X98 [dial-340]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 340 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X99 [dial-345]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 345 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X100 [dial-350]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 350 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X101 [dial-355]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 355 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X102 [dial-360]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 360 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X103 [dial-365]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 365 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X104 [dial-370]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 370 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X105 [dial-375]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 375 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X106 [dial-380]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 380 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X107 [dial-385]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 385 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X108 [dial-390]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 390 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X109 [dial-395]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 395 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X110 [dial-400]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 400 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X111 [dial-405]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 405 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X112 [dial-410]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 410 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X113 [dial-415]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 415 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X114 [dial-420]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 420 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X115 [dial-425]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 425 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X116 [dial-430]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 430 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X117 [dial-435]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 435 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X118 [dial-440]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 440 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X119 [dial-445]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 445 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X120 [dial-450]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 450 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X121 [dial-455]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 455 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X122 [dial-460]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 460 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X123 [dial-465]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 465 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X124 [dial-470]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 470 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X125 [dial-475]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 475 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X126 [dial-480]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 480 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X127 [dial-485]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 485 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X128 [dial-490]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 490 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X129 [dial-495]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 495 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X130 [dial-500]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 500 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X131 [dial-505]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 505 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X132 [dial-510]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 510 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X133 [dial-515]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 515 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X134 [dial-520]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 520 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X135 [dial-525]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 525 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X136 [dial-530]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 530 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X137 [dial-535]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 535 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X138 [dial-540]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 540 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X139 [dial-545]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 545 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X140 [dial-550]: removed the false measured cold readout. No invented viscosity or time at 550 C. Evidence E16; public correction 11.
- [fixed] X141 [added-reader-honey-comparison]: Change the assertion label to about 11 orders more viscous than honey in the source and shipped verifier. Evidence E22; public correction 16.

## Evidence

E01 (every-number-live): The original hot branch evaluates a formula; the cold branch assigns constants. Static historical and comparison prose is not recomputed live. Sources: git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html Disposition: Describe live hot-model calculations and separately sourced cold estimates; narrow metadata and plain-language copies. No public line for MINOR.

E02 (ediger-field-label): The UW profile identifies glasses, physical and mechanical properties of materials, and a polymer-physics award. The interview calls Ediger a chemistry professor. These are compatible with a description of his research field. Sources: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-fiction-glass-liquid/; https://experts.news.wisc.edu/experts/mark-ediger Disposition: REJECTED: the departmental title does not contradict the field description. Leave the description and quotation unchanged.

E03 (cold-band-off-graph): Original axes span log10 viscosity -4 to 24. The cold band at x=20, y=20 to 22 is inside the plot near the upper left. The revised span 19 to 22 remains there. Sources: git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html Disposition: Correct the graph caption to put the room estimates inside the plot near the upper left.

E04 (calculated-curve-called-measured): Lyon (1974), Appendix B, p. 503 derives A=-1.594, B=4111.7 and T0=280.3 from composition-predicted values at 700, 900 and 1300 C. This is model provenance, not direct measurement of the displayed curve. Sources: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/78a/jresv78an4p497_a1b.pdf; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html Disposition: Identify Lyon and the predictive calculation in the caption, check, source list, Markdown and verifier comments.

E05 (room-marker-low-left): The same axis and drawing code as E03 place the room band high on the left. The Physics FAQ describes the room-temperature input as an extrapolation. Sources: https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html Disposition: Replace the false lower-left locator and retain the estimate qualification.

E06 (all-old-panes-hand-spun): Brill p. 1 names both crown and cylinder manufacture. The Physics FAQ also identifies other pane-making techniques. Crown spinning cannot describe all pre-float windows. Sources: https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html Disposition: Allow crown and cylinder methods in the history, dek, plain text, social descriptions, JSON-LD, Markdown body and verifier comments.

E07 (crown-taper-overgeneralization): Plumb p. 996 reproduces a historical account with a central swelling, possible rim thickening and nearly uniform glass elsewhere. It does not require a smooth radial taper. Sources: https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/JCE1989p0994.pdf Disposition: Describe variable thickness and label the existing colour gradient as a schematic. No public line for MINOR.

E08 (every-pane-wedge): Plumb p. 996 permits nearly uniform crown glass outside the central swelling and says achieving uniformity requires skill. Universal wedge shapes do not follow. Sources: https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/JCE1989p0994.pdf Disposition: Replace the universal wedge claim with panes that can inherit unevenness, including nearly uniform areas.

E09 (disc-drag-unimplemented): The original cut rectangle is fixed. Its complete inline program attaches no input handlers to the pane canvas; the temperature and orientation controls do have handlers. The baseline runtime reproduced this. Sources: git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html Disposition: Describe the fixed cut and the working orientation buttons; do not advertise dragging.

E10 (pane-view-not-edge-on): The right-hand drawing uses the same rectangular outline in every orientation; colour changes encode thickness. Its declared thin/thick variables were unused. Sources: git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html Disposition: Call it a schematic pane with colour representing thickness; remove unused edge-profile variables and inaccurate comments.

E11 (brill-top-side-attribution): Brill p. 1 relays a secondhand Orowan anecdote about top and bottom, then reports thickness variations within fragments. He supplies neither an orientation survey nor side-installation evidence. Scientific American attributes ancient-vessel observations to him. Sources: https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-fiction-glass-liquid/ Disposition: Narrow the history and source annotation; make top/side control text explicitly schematic; remove unsupported survey claims from the dek and JSON-LD.

E12 (abbey-artifact-sample): Borja, MRS Bulletin 42 (2017), p. 697 describes fabricating a composition-matched sample and viscosity measurements used to validate the model. Gulbiten et al. describe a typical Westminster Abbey composition and a calculated maximum flow. Sources: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/mrs-bulletin/article/shattering-the-myth-of-fastflowing-medieval-glass/397C171170F2EBB42047E230D2E47B87; https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092 Disposition: Replace the removed-artifact story with a newly made composition-matched sample; distinguish measurements from room-temperature model results.

E13 (atomic-millionth-conversion): The study maximum is approximately 1 nm per billion years. Linear scaling to 800 years gives 8e-7 nm; dividing by the existing 0.3 nm comparison diameter gives 2.6666667e-6. Sources: https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs Disposition: Use about 2.7 millionths and retain that this is a scaled maximum; add the numerical assertion.

E14 (thirty-order-displacement-gap): With 800-year scaled maximum 8e-7 nm and an explicitly chosen 1 mm benchmark (1e6 nm), log10(1e6/8e-7)=12.096910. The benchmark is declared here, not attributed to the paper. Sources: https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs Disposition: Replace thirty orders with 12.1 orders relative to an explicit 1 mm benchmark; assert the calculation.

E15 (verifier-everything): The standalone verifier calculates selected numerical quantities. It does not read the page or authenticate historical attributions; its original less-than-one-atom test did not test the millionth or thirty-order claims. Sources: git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs Disposition: Limit the check introduction to the listed model quantities and comparisons. No public line for MINOR.

E16 (cold-viscosity-measured): The original inline program displays a fixed 1e20 to 1e22 band as measured for all 108 settings below 560 C. All 108 outputs were reproduced before editing. The FAQ calls its 1e22 room value an extrapolation. No selected-temperature values are supplied for 25 through 555 C. Sources: https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.15092; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs; https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glass/glass.html; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html Disposition: At 20 C label the separately cited 1e19 and 1e22 inputs as estimates; at 25 through 555 C withhold viscosity and flow-time estimates. Remove the false cold marker and below-transition curve; update labels, prose and verifier comments.

E17 (lowest-viscosity-poise-conversion): Brill p. 2 reports 1e20 poise; 10 poise=1 Pa s gives 1e19 Pa s. With rho=2500, g=9.81 and h=0.003, tau=4.306910e9 years, below 13.8e9. The FAQ input 1e22 gives 4.306910e12 years. These examples are not bounds for all glass. Sources: https://www.glassnotes.com/resources/pdf/Glass-Flow.pdf; https://glassproperties.com/viscosity/Glass-Viscosity-Fixpoints.htm; git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs Disposition: Correct the adopted low input, all age-of-universe lower-bound claims and the honey comparison; verify the unit conversion and both characteristic times.

E18 (vft-pole-proves-no-flow): Zanotto (1998), p. 393 explicitly allows a different flow mechanism below the VFT pole and calls for another equation. Failure of this model cannot prove a physical prohibition. Sources: https://osiris.df.unipi.it/~leporini/DFWebSite/ReviewsTg/CathedralGlasses.pdf Disposition: State the model limit in Markdown and verifier comments; ground the historical-timescale conclusion in separate estimates and old objects.

E19 (pressure-melting-absolute-denial): The Penn interview says pressure melting occurs over a narrow temperature range, while ice is slippery outside it. An unqualified denial excludes that real case. Sources: https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/penn-engineering-why-are-icy-surfaces-slippery Disposition: Qualify this layer's relation note and regenerate its local teaser to say pressure melting does not generally explain skating.

E20 (above-tg-means-pourable): The baseline at 595 C printed pourable/workable while computing log10(eta Pa s)=10.471459 and tau=12.753369 years. The fixed-point table places working viscosity at 1e3 Pa s. Crossing Tg by 35 C does not establish pourability. Sources: https://glassproperties.com/viscosity/Glass-Viscosity-Fixpoints.htm; git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html Disposition: Label the hot branch as a model calculation and remove the blanket pourable/workable claim.

E21 (near-tg-hundreds-below): The original solid branch runs at 555 C, only 5 C below its 560 C transition, yet prints hundreds of degrees below. The baseline runtime reproduced it. Sources: git show f5e5f84f34:public/strata/glass-is-liquid/index.html Disposition: Use a temperature-distance statement true at every cold setting: below the chosen 560 C transition.

E22 (honey-comparison-23-orders): The original assertion label said 23, while its code and expected value calculate log10(eta at 560 C)-1=11.106393. The numerical comparison itself was already about 11. Sources: git show f5e5f84f34:research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs; https://artwaste.land/checks/research/glass-is-liquid/verify.mjs Disposition: Change the assertion label to about 11 orders more viscous than honey in the source and shipped verifier.

## Verification

The numerical verifier passed 20 checks. The page runtime check exercised all 108 cold and 179 hot settings, graph positions and labels, three orientation controls, 16 matching public and Markdown correction lines, the JSON-LD revision date and the shipped verifier copy. See research/glass-is-liquid/fix-report-2026-10-14.md for exact commands, the repository gate result, before/after edits and all item outcomes.