--- slug: rheomode passed: 2026-10-14 by: the assay line (research/assay-line/cited-1014/), Codex fixer directed by claude-assaying-boyle-1014; source record by Codex, checked by Codex checked: 217 confirmed: 202 wrong: 15 unverifiable: 0 observed: 0 stale: 0 --- This was the directed rheomode correction pass at 063be8ff92: the fixer re-read the evidence for all 15 triage items, made text corrections for 10 WRONG items under seven shared error corrections, left four listed MINOR items unchanged, and kept the shared placard item WRONG under board note 81816d. The repair review on 2026-10-14 left X6 and X13 open because the share image and its thumbnail kept the old chronology; the directing instance then regenerated both, which closes them. This record also preserves the 202 CONFIRMED claims re-read by Codex in research/assay-line/cited-1014/rheomode/N2-codex.md at its pinned snapshot; those lines are the checker's prior source determinations, not a claim that the fixer independently repeated all 202 checks. The wrong count includes the 11 WRONG and four MINOR lines. Seven dated corrections appear on the page and at the end of the markdown body; no correction line was added for a MINOR item. Literal \u2014 preserves punctuation in the recorded old claims without writing that character. ## Claims - WRONG | Every underlined word has a verb frozen inside it. | git show 2fcfb9c17f:public/strata/rheomode/index.html; git show 2fcfb9c17f:research/rheomode/ground-truth.json | X1; All 18 marked words receive the frozen class and dotted border. Both etymology arrays have 15 melting entries and three refusals: thing, language and noun. The instruction and empty-card prompt now allow the refusals; source glosses are unchanged. - WRONG | Bohm wondered in print whether any natural language had taken the verb-first road. The honest answer, from the linguistics of the century since, is: some come remarkably close \u2014 and the most famous example the internet will hand you is the wrong one. | https://centreforscientificarchives.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/BOHM_DAVID_JOSEPH.pdf; https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | X2; The book copyright page dates first publication to 1980, and the archive catalogue dates the rheomode typescript to 1971. Neither is a century before 2026. The cited Sapir book is from 1921. The page now says the linguistic literature, without implying that all of it followed Bohm. - WRONG | In the Wakashan languages of Vancouver Island, Edward Sapir found word-class boundaries so fluid he used them in Language (1921) to argue the noun–verb split is not a human universal. | https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12629.txt.utf-8 | X3; Sapir, Language, chapter V, concludes that every language distinguishes noun and verb, while allowing that the distinction may be elusive. Corrected the reversed attribution in the card and FIELD-CHECK.md. - WRONG | His student Morris Swadesh went further (“Nootka internal syntax,” 1939): every full word is essentially predicative \u2014 closer to “it houses” than “a house.” | https://lingpapers.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2018/03/2000_Wojdak.pdf; https://kwistuup.net/_/mss/_/BRAITHWAITE_2015.pdf | X4; Wojdak (2000), p. 269, quotes Swadesh p. 79: predication or non-predication depends on the word ending. The following examples use the same roots as predicates and arguments. Corrected the universal claim in the card and FIELD-CHECK.md; this finding does not settle the 1938/1939 bibliographic conflict. - MINOR | Jacobsen (1979) showed verb-like roots need a determiner suffix (-ʔiː) to serve as arguments, where true nouns don’t. | https://kwistuup.net/_/mss/_/BRAITHWAITE_2015.pdf; https://swl8.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/Inman.pdf | X5; Braithwaite (2015), section 2.1, pp. 51-52, identifies Jacobsen's Makah analysis with -iq, then documents the Nuu-chah-nulth pattern with -ʔii. Inman, section 4, credits the article diagnostic to Jacobsen. The Nuu-chah-nulth suffix and phenomenon are supported; -ʔiː and -ʔii both indicate the long vowel. Triage Tier C: retain MINOR for the compressed attribution and leave the separate sentence unchanged. - WRONG | Bohm invented the rheomode in 1980 from inside physics and philosophy \u2014 not from any indigenous language. | https://centreforscientificarchives.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/BOHM_DAVID_JOSEPH.pdf; https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | X6; The archive catalogue, supplement NCUACS 156/6/07, p. 15 (PDF page 71), places B.91/B.92 under 1971 and describes B.92 as a rheomode typescript. The book copyright page gives 1980 as first publication. Corrected the page and markdown invention/build-date copies to distinguish documented work by 1971 from book publication; the catalogue does not establish an exact invention date. public/og/rheomode.png and public/og-thumbs/rheomode.webp still carry the old 1980 chronology; image regeneration remains open pending a board note. - MINOR | Bohm’s deepest claim about the rheomode was not that anyone would adopt it. It was that doing the derivations \u2014 even briefly, even playfully \u2014 produces something prose cannot: a proprioception of language. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | X7; Bohm, chapter 2, p. 35, proposes an experiment that may give insight rather than an established result from a brief exercise. Triage Tier C: retain MINOR for interpretive overstatement; no contrary experimental outcome was established and this separate sentence is unchanged. - WRONG | the three words that refuse the thesis are displayed with the same prominence as the twenty that obey it. | git show 2fcfb9c17f:research/rheomode/ground-truth.json | X8; Recounted both ground-truth arrays: 15 entries without refuses and three with refuses true. ETYMOLOGY.md independently gives 15 melting entries. Replaced twenty with fifteen in the check paragraph, sharing the correction with X11 and X12. - MINOR | Every linguistic claim in Movement III carries its citation on the card, including the failed replications | git show 2fcfb9c17f:public/strata/rheomode/index.html | X9; The fourth card names grammatical-gender replication failures but its citation line has Winawer, Levinson, Chen and Boroditsky, with no Mickan/Schiefke/Stefanowitsch reference. Triage Tier C: retain MINOR for incomplete documentation, not a disproved replication result; the separate checking sentence is unchanged. - WRONG | It is published with everything it imports, | git show 2fcfb9c17f:public/checks/manifest.json; https://artwaste.land/checks/verify-rheomode.mjs | X10; The published verifier imports an absolute /opt Playwright path and reads absolute local dist and ground-truth paths. Its manifest excludes the ground-truth dataset. The direct verifier run exits 1 at ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND before any assertion. scripts/check-placard.mjs writes the disputed completeness sentence. Mandatory shared placard class: retain WRONG and hold under existing board note 81816d; no per-layer placard edit or correction line. - WRONG | Melt the verbs frozen inside fifteen more English nouns (attention is a stretching-toward; decision is a cutting-off), and meet the three words that refuse. | git show 2fcfb9c17f:research/rheomode/ground-truth.json | X11; The 15 melting entries include relevant, which the dek already introduces. ETYMOLOGY.md calls the remainder 14 other melters. Replaced fifteen more with fourteen more, sharing the inventory correction with X8 and X12. - WRONG | twenty English nouns thawed by real etymology | git show 2fcfb9c17f:research/rheomode/ground-truth.json | X12; The repository and embedded etymology arrays agree on 15 melting entries and three refusals. Replaced twenty with fifteen in the description, Open Graph description and JSON-LD, sharing the inventory correction with X8 and X11. - WRONG | The rheomode, the verb-first English the physicist David Bohm built in 1980 because he suspected that subject-verb-object grammar teaches every speaker the world is a warehouse of separate things. | https://centreforscientificarchives.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/BOHM_DAVID_JOSEPH.pdf; https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | X13; The catalogue dates B.92 to 1971; 1980 is the book publication date. The plain frontmatter and its HTML metadata mirror now say documented by 1971 and published in the 1980 book. The surrounding dek, descriptions and header now identify 1980 as publication. Shares the invention-date correction with X6, including the unresolved old chronology in public/og/rheomode.png and public/og-thumbs/rheomode.webp; image regeneration remains open pending a board note. - WRONG | saturated with the temporal reference Hopi supposedly lacked, right down to a dedicated future marker (-ni). | https://www.rexresearch1.com/HopiLanguageLibrary/HopiTimeMalotki.pdf | X14; Read and visually inspected Malotki's opening epigraph (PDF page 7): it ends with the girl being awakened, with taa-tay-na and no -ni. Printed p. 624 (PDF page 646) separately identifies -ni as a future marker. Corrected the surrounding prose to separate the two passages, preserving the quotation. - MINOR | The rheomode is a grammar engineered to say exactly that without being able to say anything else. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | X15; Bohm, chapter 2, p. 60, describes a world view implied by the rheomode and a possible benefit from attending to language's pressures. This does not demonstrate an absolute grammatical prohibition. Triage Tier C: retain MINOR for philosophical overstatement, not a tested impossibility result; the separate related-page sentence is unchanged. - CONFIRMED | In 1980 the quantum physicist David Bohm tried to rebuild English so that it could not hold still. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=experiment-1980; The copyright page says "First published 1980" and "First published in Routledge Classics 2002". Confirmed as the year this experiment was presented in this book, not its invention date; see claims 52 and 247. - CONFIRMED | He called the result the rheomode \u2014 the flowing mode, from the Greek verb rhein, to flow \u2014 and he built it because he had come to suspect that the sentence itself, subject–verb–object, was quietly teaching everyone who used it that the world is a warehouse of separate things. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=rheomode-name; Chapter 2 names the rheomode, explains rheo as a Greek verb meaning "to flow", and connects the subject-verb-object structure with fragmentation. The source record joins passages out of order; its PARTIAL result is not a substantive contradiction. - CONFIRMED | Bohm spent his career on quantum theory, where the deepest trouble is that the world refuses to come apart into pieces \u2014 measure one thing and another, far away, is already implicated. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt; https://centreforscientificarchives.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/BOHM_DAVID_JOSEPH.pdf | id=physics-career; Chapter 1 describes observer and observed as "aspects of one whole reality"; the Bohm archive catalogue biography documents his career in quantum theory. The statement about the deepest trouble is the page's characterization, not a quoted theorem. - CONFIRMED | His book Wholeness and the Implicate Order argues that the fragmentation we experience is not out there in the world but manufactured \u2014 and chapter two names a chief suspect: grammar. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=fragmentation-book; Chapter 2, pp. 34-35, explicitly examines language structure as a contributor to fragmentation in thought; it does not claim language is the only cause. - CONFIRMED | A sentence like “the observer looks at the observed” has already decided, before anything true or false gets said, that there are two standing objects and a little bridge of action between them. The structure ships with the verdict built in. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=observer-example; The source uses "The observer looks at the object" and discusses a separation between observer and observed. The page says "a sentence like", so its altered example is not presented as a verbatim quotation. - CONFIRMED | So Bohm did something almost no philosopher of language has the nerve to do: instead of writing another argument about the problem \u2014 in the very grammar he was indicting \u2014 he built a small working alternative and invited the reader to run it. Not a new language, he insisted: an experiment. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=working-alternative; Bohm proposes an experiment and says the aim is "not to produce a well-defined alternative to present language structures". The comparative remark about other philosophers is authorial appraisal; the checkable description of the experiment agrees. - CONFIRMED | Is it not possible for the syntax and grammatical form of language to be changed so as to give a basic role to the verb rather than to the noun? | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=bohm-question; The question is present in chapter 2, p. 37, with the same wording. - CONFIRMED | The rheomode begins with verb roots for the primary acts of mind \u2014 attending, perceiving, ordering, seeing-truth, making. Each root then runs through the same small derivation machinery: re- (the act done again, freshly, in a new context), irre- (the act failing to fit \u2014 done where it no longer answers), -ant (the state of the act fitting), and -ation (the continuing whole of the activity). That is the entire grammar. Its point is not vocabulary but motion: in the rheomode you cannot mention attention, perception, or truth as finished objects \u2014 only as acts currently underway, fitting or failing to fit. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=roots-and-machinery; The source supports the four derivational operations, the displayed families, and nouns signifying continuing activity rather than separate objects. Read "entire grammar" in the immediately specified sense of the page's small derivation engine; this is not evidence of a complete natural-language syntax. Bohm calls the list the "overall structure" at pp. 50-51. - CONFIRMED | Levate names the spontaneous act of lifting anything at all into attention. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=levate-definition; The levate definition at p. 44 explicitly specifies spontaneous, unrestricted lifting of any content into attention. - CONFIRMED | Do it again, in a fresh context, and you re-levate the content. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=relevate-definition; The p. 44 definition of re-levate says to lift content into attention again for a particular context, indicated by thought and language. - CONFIRMED | If the lifting fits the moment \u2014 if what you raised actually answers what is going on \u2014 the act is re-levant. If it persists past its fit, it is irre-levant. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=relevant-irrelevant; Pages 44-45 distinguish a fit ("to re-levate is re-levant") from non-fitting ("to re-levate is irre-levant"). The change from property to act is the page's explanation of this stipulation. - CONFIRMED | Bohm has walked you, in four steps of a toy grammar, straight into two of the most ordinary words in English \u2014 and they have changed on arrival: relevance stopped being a property and became something someone is doing. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=relevance-act; Pages 44-45 distinguish a fit ("to re-levate is re-levant") from non-fitting ("to re-levate is irre-levant"). The change from property to act is the page's explanation of this stipulation. - CONFIRMED | He did not conjure levate from thin air: he dug up an obsolete English verb, “to relevate” \u2014 to lift into attention \u2014 and restarted it (p. 42). | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=obsolete-relevate; Page 42 revives "to relevate" and glosses it as lifting into attention; p. 44 introduces levate. This is an attribution to Bohm's account, not an independently dated discovery of the obsolete verb. - CONFIRMED | And the etymology he was banking on checks out independently: the living word relevant really does descend \u2014 through Medieval Latin relevantem, into Scottish law in the early 1500s \u2014 from exactly re- + levare, to lift up again. | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevant | id=relevant-route; Wiktionary gives early 1500s Scots legal borrowing from Latin relevans/relevantem, then general English, and relevo from re- plus levo. Etymonline instead gives the French route and "to lessen, lighten". The page openly records that disagreement; the metaphor about forgetting is not historical testimony. - CONFIRMED | The act he wanted the word to name is the act the word was coined from, centuries before him, and then forgot. | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevant | id=relevant-old-act; Wiktionary gives early 1500s Scots legal borrowing from Latin relevans/relevantem, then general English, and relevo from re- plus levo. Etymonline instead gives the French route and "to lessen, lighten". The page openly records that disagreement; the metaphor about forgetting is not historical testimony. - CONFIRMED | English abstract nouns are, again and again, verbs that stopped moving \u2014 acts poured into Latin participles and left to set. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/decision | id=abstract-nouns-generalization; The etymological examples do contain verbal and participial ancestry. Decision, for example, is from decidere, "to cut off". This is a recurrent tendency, qualified by the three counterexamples below, not a claim about every English abstract noun. - CONFIRMED | Thing descends from Old English þing, an assembly \u2014 the deliberative meeting, as in Iceland’s Alþingi \u2014 so it is a frozen parliament, not a frozen act, and its deeper verb root is speculative. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/thing | id=thing-etymology-prose; Etymonline gives Old English þing as meeting/assembly and the Alþingi example; a deeper etymology involving stretching/time is tentative. The page preserves that uncertainty. The source record's Etymonline URL was unreadable automatically but its entry was opened manually. - CONFIRMED | Language is Latin lingua, the tongue: a frozen organ. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/language | id=language-etymology-prose; Etymonline traces language through French to Latin lingua, "tongue". The frozen-organ description is an interpretive metaphor for this nominal source. - CONFIRMED | And noun itself is Latin nomen, “name,” a noun all the way down \u2014 the tempting link to gnoscere, “to know,” is a documented false association. | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/nomen?oldid=0 | id=noun-etymology-prose; The Wiktionary nomen entry identifies the inherited Indo-European noun and calls the connection with gnoscere a false association. The entry was read successfully. - CONFIRMED | The thaw is a strong pattern in the learned Latin layer of English, not a law of nature \u2014 which is worth saying plainly, because Bohm’s own point was about what grammar tends to do, not what it must. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=tendency-not-law; The displayed examples support a tendency in learned vocabulary and explicitly retain counterexamples. Bohm's chapter similarly describes tendencies and pressures, not an inescapable law. - CONFIRMED | where almost any root can predicate | https://kwistuup.net/_/mss/_/BRAITHWAITE_2015.pdf | id=nuuchahnulth-root-predicates; Braithwaite's abstract accepts distinct noun/verb categories while reporting that almost all roots take both nominal and verbal inflection. The paper notes restrictions and exceptions; the page's "almost" and rejection of "no nouns" are appropriate. - CONFIRMED | The nuance modern specialists insist on: the distinction is weak, not absent. | https://kwistuup.net/_/mss/_/BRAITHWAITE_2015.pdf | id=nuuchahnulth-categories; Braithwaite's abstract accepts distinct noun/verb categories while reporting that almost all roots take both nominal and verbal inflection. The paper notes restrictions and exceptions; the page's "almost" and rejection of "no nouns" are appropriate. - CONFIRMED | So the honest claim is “the noun–verb boundary runs shallow here,” never “a language with no nouns.” | https://kwistuup.net/_/mss/_/BRAITHWAITE_2015.pdf | id=noun-boundary-shallow; Braithwaite's abstract accepts distinct noun/verb categories while reporting that almost all roots take both nominal and verbal inflection. The paper notes restrictions and exceptions; the page's "almost" and rejection of "no nouns" are appropriate. - CONFIRMED | Sapir 1921; Swadesh 1939, IJAL 9; | https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12629.txt.utf-8; https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1086/463820; https://kwistuup.net/_/mss/_/BRAITHWAITE_2015.pdf; https://lingpapers.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2018/03/2000_Wojdak.pdf | id=citation-sapir; Sapir's Language is dated 1921. The Swadesh article title and IJAL volume 9 are correct. Crossref/publisher metadata date DOI 10.1086/463820 to 1938, whereas Braithwaite and Wojdak cite it as 1939. Retain this documented bibliographic conflict rather than turn the automatic DOI mismatch alone into a factual error. - CONFIRMED | Swadesh 1939, IJAL 9 | https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12629.txt.utf-8; https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1086/463820; https://kwistuup.net/_/mss/_/BRAITHWAITE_2015.pdf; https://lingpapers.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2018/03/2000_Wojdak.pdf | id=citation-swadesh; Sapir's Language is dated 1921. The Swadesh article title and IJAL volume 9 are correct. Crossref/publisher metadata date DOI 10.1086/463820 to 1938, whereas Braithwaite and Wojdak cite it as 1939. Retain this documented bibliographic conflict rather than turn the automatic DOI mismatch alone into a factual error. - CONFIRMED | Jacobsen (1979) | https://kwistuup.net/_/mss/_/BRAITHWAITE_2015.pdf | id=citation-jacobsen; Braithwaite's bibliography identifies Jacobsen (1979), "Noun and verb in Nootkan". The citation exists; its use in claim 29 needs a more precise attribution. - CONFIRMED | Braithwaite 2015 review. | https://kwistuup.net/_/mss/_/BRAITHWAITE_2015.pdf | id=citation-braithwaite; The author, year and subject match the paper. It reviews prior analyses and presents its own morphological argument; describing it as a review does not change the cited result. - CONFIRMED | The Navajo verb is the sentence’s working core, and it classifies what it handles: there is no single verb “to give.” | https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED021655.pdf; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navajo_grammar | id=navajo-give; The recorded Navajo grammar entry matches. Independently checked Robert W. Young's primary grammar in ERIC, printed pp. 59-61: loose hay is class 2, a cigaret class 3, with different "Give it to me" stems; the list also includes roundish, flat flexible and animate classes. - CONFIRMED | Hand someone hay and the verb runs on the non-compact-matter stem; hand them a cigarette and it runs on the slender-stiff-object stem. | https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED021655.pdf; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navajo_grammar | id=navajo-hay-cigarette; The recorded Navajo grammar entry matches. Independently checked Robert W. Young's primary grammar in ERIC, printed pp. 59-61: loose hay is class 2, a cigaret class 3, with different "Give it to me" stems; the list also includes roundish, flat flexible and animate classes. - CONFIRMED | Roundish solids, flat flexible things, animate beings \u2014 each rides its own handling verb. The physical character of the object lives inside the act, not beside it. | https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED021655.pdf; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navajo_grammar | id=navajo-shapes; The recorded Navajo grammar entry matches. Independently checked Robert W. Young's primary grammar in ERIC, printed pp. 59-61: loose hay is class 2, a cigaret class 3, with different "Give it to me" stems; the list also includes roundish, flat flexible and animate classes. - CONFIRMED | Young & Morgan 1987, The Navajo Language | https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-Navajo-Language/Robert-W-Young/9780826310149 | id=citation-young-morgan; The publisher listing names Robert W. Young and William Morgan, The Navajo Language, University of New Mexico Press, 1987. The initial curl block was bypassed by opening the publisher page manually. - CONFIRMED | Fernald & Willie on classificatory stems. | https://linguistlist.org/issues/13/543/ | id=citation-fernald-willie; The publisher-supplied table of contents on Linguist List includes T. B. Fernald and M. A. Willie, "Navajo Classification and Coercion". - CONFIRMED | What survives is weaker and stranger: Russian’s obligatory light-blue/dark-blue split measurably speeds cross-category colour discrimination, and the advantage vanishes under verbal interference (Winawer et al. 2007). | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1876524/ | id=russian-blue; The primary PNAS paper confirms the Russian light/dark blue category advantage, its disruption by verbal rather than spatial interference, and 2007, volume 104, pp. 7780-7785. Full text was read through PMC after the automatic fetch was unreadable. - CONFIRMED | Guugu Yimithirr runs on compass directions instead of left/right, and its speakers’ spatial memory runs on compass too (Levinson 1997, 2003). | https://www.mpi.nl/people/levinson-stephen/publications?f%5B0%5D=publication_date%3A1997&f%5B1%5D=publication_type%3A11185 | id=guugu-memory; Levinson's 1997 publication abstract reports predominantly absolute frames in Guugu Yimithirr nonverbal memory versus relative frames in Dutch. The 2003 book is also correctly cited. "Runs on compass" is a summary of the preferred frame, not a claim that speakers lack all body-relative expressions. - CONFIRMED | Mandarin vertical-time (failed replication, Chen 2007; | https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:17070793&format=json&resultType=core | id=mandarin-failed-replication; Chen's primary abstract reports four failed attempts to replicate the Mandarin vertical-time findings. Europe PMC confirms Cognition 104(2), 2007. Changing response metadata explains the PARTIAL excerpt match; title, authorship and result agree. - CONFIRMED | later refined evidence, Boroditsky et al. 2011 \u2014 contested) | https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:21030013&format=json&resultType=core | id=mandarin-later-evidence; Europe PMC record EXT_ID:21030013 confirms Boroditsky, Fuhrman and McCormick, Cognition 118(1):123-129 (2011), and the abstract's refined evidence. PubMed's challenge response was not treated as the paper. - CONFIRMED | grammatical-gender personalities (multiple failed replications). | https://stefanowitsch.de/anatol/files/p/mickanetal2014_kls.pdf | id=gender-replication; Mickan, Schiefke and Stefanowitsch (2014) report two failed experimental replications, one word-association and one primed lexical-decision experiment. Thus plural replications is supported, though the page omits their citation on the card (claim 70). - CONFIRMED | Strong Whorf \u2014 language determines thought \u2014 is dead. | https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcs.104; https://stefanowitsch.de/anatol/files/p/mickanetal2014_kls.pdf | id=strong-whorf; The supplied Mickan excerpt concerns grammatical gender only and cannot establish the general conclusion. Re-sourced to Wolff and Holmes (2011): they report no support for language determining basic thought categories, while distinguishing weaker supported effects. "Dead" is the page's rhetorical summary of rejection of strong determinism. - CONFIRMED | Language nudges habitual attention in specific domains. It does not build the prison. | https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcs.104; https://www.mpi.nl/people/levinson-stephen/publications?f%5B0%5D=publication_date%3A1997&f%5B1%5D=publication_type%3A11185 | id=language-nudges; The specific experimental findings and Wolff/Holmes review support domain-specific influences without strict determinism. This is a synthesis, not a verbatim conclusion from any one experiment. - CONFIRMED | Winawer et al. 2007, PNAS 104:7780 | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1876524/ | id=citation-winawer; The primary PNAS paper confirms the Russian light/dark blue category advantage, its disruption by verbal rather than spatial interference, and 2007, volume 104, pp. 7780-7785. Full text was read through PMC after the automatic fetch was unreadable. - CONFIRMED | Levinson 1997, 2003 | https://www.mpi.nl/people/levinson-stephen/publications?f%5B0%5D=publication_date%3A1997&f%5B1%5D=publication_type%3A11185 | id=citation-levinson-1997; Levinson's 1997 publication abstract reports predominantly absolute frames in Guugu Yimithirr nonverbal memory versus relative frames in Dutch. The 2003 book is also correctly cited. "Runs on compass" is a summary of the preferred frame, not a claim that speakers lack all body-relative expressions. - CONFIRMED | Levinson 1997, 2003 | https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 | id=citation-levinson-2003; Crossref confirms Stephen C. Levinson, Space in Language and Cognition, Cambridge University Press, 2003, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511613609. The enormous supplied JSON excerpt was checked for the relevant title, date and abstract, not treated as evidence from its unrelated reference list. - CONFIRMED | Chen 2007; Boroditsky et al. 2011. | https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:17070793&format=json&resultType=core | id=citation-chen; Chen's primary abstract reports four failed attempts to replicate the Mandarin vertical-time findings. Europe PMC confirms Cognition 104(2), 2007. Changing response metadata explains the PARTIAL excerpt match; title, authorship and result agree. - CONFIRMED | Boroditsky et al. 2011. | https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:21030013&format=json&resultType=core | id=citation-boroditsky; Europe PMC record EXT_ID:21030013 confirms Boroditsky, Fuhrman and McCormick, Cognition 118(1):123-129 (2011), and the abstract's refined evidence. PubMed's challenge response was not treated as the paper. - CONFIRMED | The famous meeting came later: around 1992, in a dialogue circle convened with the physicist F. David Peat, Bohm sat with speakers of Algonquian languages \u2014 among them the Blackfoot philosopher Leroy Little Bear \u2014 and learned that verb-based grammars of process and flux were not a thought experiment but somebody’s Tuesday. | https://journeyingtoturtleisland.wordpress.com/about-the-film/ | id=dialogue-1992; The film's own account places the dialogue in 1992 with Bohm, Peat and Leroy Little Bear, under Fetzer sponsorship. The named participants and approximate chronology agree. - CONFIRMED | Little Bear’s characterization of Blackfoot as, roughly, hundreds of variations on “to be” is his evocative gloss, reported through Peat’s Blackfoot Physics \u2014 we pass it on as attributed paraphrase, not as a grammatical count. | https://paricenter.com/library-new/david-bohm/going-with-the-flow-a-western-physicists-odyssey-into-indigenous-language-and-science/ | id=little-bear-paraphrase; The Peat account transmitted by Pari Center attributes an evocative figure of 800 variations to Little Bear. The page deliberately says "roughly, hundreds" and identifies it as attributed paraphrase, not a verified grammatical inventory. - CONFIRMED | The rheomode was not borrowed from these languages; it was independently, imperfectly, reinvented toward them. | https://glennaparicioparry.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/glenn-aparicio-parry-chapter-4.pdf | id=origin-not-borrowed; Parry's account says Little Bear already knew of Bohm's rheomode work before the 1992 meeting. This supports the claimed direction of influence for that encounter; it does not establish an exhaustive history of every possible influence. - CONFIRMED | He never declared victory. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=never-victory; The closing paragraph at p. 60 leaves active adoption unresolved. The page's marked ellipsis removes "however"; it does not reverse or materially change the sentence. "Never declared victory" is read in its immediate context as the chapter's verdict, not an unsupported survey of all later speech. - CONFIRMED | Whether it would be useful to go further […] and to try to introduce the rheomode into active usage, it is not possible to say at present, though perhaps some such development may eventually be found to be helpful | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=bohm-closing; The closing paragraph at p. 60 leaves active adoption unresolved. The page's marked ellipsis removes "however"; it does not reverse or materially change the sentence. "Never declared victory" is read in its immediate context as the chapter's verdict, not an unsupported survey of all later speech. - CONFIRMED | David Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, ch. 2, “The rheomode \u2014 an experiment with language and thought,” pp. 34–60 in the Routledge Classics typesetting (2002; first published 1980). | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=primary-reference; The book scan confirms first publication 1980, Routledge Classics 2002, chapter 2 title and printed pp. 34-60. - CONFIRMED | The chapter prints “re-constation” at p. 57 and “re-constatation” at p. 58 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=constation-variant; Read both occurrences in the full chapter: re-constation at p. 57 and re-constatation at p. 58. They are two printed spellings, not two engine outputs. - CONFIRMED | One appearance of “dividation” at p. 48 runs unhyphenated beside “di-vidation.” | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=dividation-variant; The p. 48 text contains unhyphenated dividation as well as di-vidation. The engine regularizes its own displayed form and the apparatus discloses the variant. - CONFIRMED | Factate gets no published noun forms at all | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=factate-no-nouns; Read the entire factate passage and token-searched the whole chapter: factation, re-factation and irre-factation each occur 0 times. Positive controls in the same chapter/search: factate occurs once and re-factate three times; all four published verb/adjective forms are present. Full counts in primary-form-check.txt. - CONFIRMED | And later chapters quietly drop the hyphens (relevate, relevating, ch. 6) and coin synordinate \u2014 Bohm’s own later usage, outside the ch. 2 canon this page regenerates. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=later-forms; The full book's later chapter 6 contains unhyphenated relevate and its inflections and the terms synordinate/asynordinate, outside the chapter 2 regular inventory. Read the cited p. 194 passage and the pp. 191-198 context. - CONFIRMED | The seven roots, the affix machinery, and every green-badged form are his. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=bohm-roots-affixes; Hand tally against the chapter: four initial families of 7, verrate 7, factate 4 and con-statate 5 gives 28+7+4+5=44 regular forms. The chapter also contains the expressly disclosed irregular spellings and inflections. This supports the page's explained regular canon, not an inventory of every inflected token in the chapter. - CONFIRMED | On “relevant,” the sources agree on the root (re- + levare) and differ on the route into English (French participle vs. Scots legal Latin); we say “through Scottish law” because Wiktionary documents that path explicitly \u2014 the disagreement is recorded here on purpose. | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevant | id=relevant-route-disagreement; Wiktionary gives early 1500s Scots legal borrowing from Latin relevans/relevantem, then general English, and relevo from re- plus levo. Etymonline instead gives the French route and "to lessen, lighten". The page openly records that disagreement; the metaphor about forgetting is not historical testimony. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline glosses relevare “to lessen, lighten” | https://www.etymonline.com/word/relevant | id=etymonline-relevant-gloss; The manually opened Etymonline relevant entry uses the exact gloss "to lessen, lighten". - CONFIRMED | the literal “lift again” decomposition is Wiktionary’s. | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevant | id=wiktionary-literal; Wiktionary says "to lift up again"; the page's "lift again" drops up without changing the decomposition. This is an etymological gloss, not a purported transcript of a sentence. The automatic exact-quote mismatch is therefore not a factual misquotation. - CONFIRMED | The showcase Nuu-chah-nulth word often glossed “several small fires were burning in the house” is real polysynthesis | https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12629.txt.utf-8 | id=nootka-showcase; Read Sapir's full Language (1921): it gives the gloss "several small fires were burning in the house" while explaining the Nootka construction. The page appropriately keeps its author's original page-pin limitation separate. - CONFIRMED | Little Bear’s “variations on ‘to be’” line is attributed paraphrase through Peat, not a quotation. | https://paricenter.com/library-new/david-bohm/going-with-the-flow-a-western-physicists-odyssey-into-indigenous-language-and-science/ | id=little-bear-attributed; The Peat account transmitted by Pari Center attributes an evocative figure of 800 variations to Little Bear. The page deliberately says "roughly, hundreds" and identifies it as attributed paraphrase, not a verified grammatical inventory. - CONFIRMED | And Bohm’s verdict on his own experiment is exactly as unresolved as his closing sentence (p. 60, quoted above) leaves it \u2014 we add no outcome he didn’t claim. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=unresolved-experiment; The closing paragraph at p. 60 leaves active adoption unresolved. The page's marked ellipsis removes "however"; it does not reverse or materially change the sentence. "Never declared victory" is read in its immediate context as the chapter's verdict, not an unsupported survey of all later speech. - CONFIRMED | the spontaneous and unrestricted act of lifting into attention any content whatsoever | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-levate; The levate definition at p. 44 explicitly specifies spontaneous, unrestricted lifting of any content into attention. - CONFIRMED | Revived from the obsolete English verb “to relevate”, to lift into attention (p. 42); root sense “to lift”, as in elevate. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-note-levate; Page 42 revives "to relevate" and glosses it as lifting into attention; p. 44 introduces levate. This is an attribution to Bohm's account, not an independently dated discovery of the obsolete verb. - CONFIRMED | a spontaneous and unrestricted act of perception of any sort whatsoever \u2014 explicitly including the act of understanding, not only visual seeing | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-vidate; The vidate passage at p. 46 invokes Latin videre and expressly includes perception/understanding beyond optical seeing. - CONFIRMED | From Latin videre, to see. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-note-vidate; The vidate passage at p. 46 invokes Latin videre and expressly includes perception/understanding beyond optical seeing. - CONFIRMED | the spontaneous act of seeing things as separate, in any form whatsoever | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-di-vidate; Page 47 gives the seeing-as-separate definition; endnote 1, p. 272, distinguishes the historical dividing root from the seeing root and calls the coincidence useful. The canonical derivatives are re-dividate, etc., without the internal hyphen. - CONFIRMED | “di” read as “separate”, so “to divide” becomes “to see as separate”. Bohm’s endnote 1 (p. 272) concedes the videre in “divide” historically means “to set apart” \u2014 a coincidence he exploits on purpose. Derived forms drop the internal hyphen: re-dividate, never re-di-vidate. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-note-di-vidate; Page 47 gives the seeing-as-separate definition; endnote 1, p. 272, distinguishes the historical dividing root from the seeing root and calls the coincidence useful. The canonical derivatives are re-dividate, etc., without the internal hyphen. - CONFIRMED | a spontaneous and unrestricted act of ordering of any sort whatsoever \u2014 engaging in the very act of ordering attention, not merely thinking about order | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-ordinate; The ordinate definition at pp. 49-50 includes spontaneous ordering and attention to the act of ordering, not merely thought about order. - CONFIRMED | a spontaneous and unrestricted act of seeing truth in any form whatsoever | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-verrate; Page 54 introduces verrate from verus, defines unrestricted seeing of truth, and explicitly explains the deliberate double r. - CONFIRMED | From Latin verus, true; the double r is Bohm’s, introduced to avoid confusion. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-note-verrate; Page 54 introduces verrate from verus, defines unrestricted seeing of truth, and explicitly explains the deliberate double r. - CONFIRMED | spontaneous and unrestricted attention to consciously directed human activity in making or doing any sort of thing whatsoever | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-factate; Page 55 gives factate as unrestricted attention to consciously directed making or doing, including the attention-calling function itself. - CONFIRMED | From “fact” as that which has been made. Bohm published NO noun forms for this family \u2014 factation and kin are our extensions. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-note-factate; Read the entire factate passage and token-searched the whole chapter: factation, re-factation and irre-factation each occur 0 times. Positive controls in the same chapter/search: factate occurs once and re-factate three times; all four published verb/adjective forms are present. Full counts in primary-form-check.txt. - CONFIRMED | giving spontaneous and unrestricted attention to how any sort of action or movement whatsoever is established in a relatively constant form that stands together relatively stably | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-con-statate; Page 57 gives con-statate, the obsolete constate/constare connection and standing-together sense. Read each derivative in pp. 57-58: re-constatate, re-constatant, irre-constatant, re-constatation have the stated spelling pattern. - CONFIRMED | From the obsolete “to constate” (Latin constare, to stand together). Hyphenated only at introduction; every printed derivative runs solid: re-constatate, re-constatant… | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=root-note-con-statate; Page 57 gives con-statate, the obsolete constate/constare connection and standing-together sense. Read each derivative in pp. 57-58: re-constatate, re-constatant, irre-constatant, re-constatation have the stated spelling pattern. - CONFIRMED | again, on another occasion \u2014 the act done afresh, for a particular context; Bohm insists on the hyphen: the word is pronounced with a break | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=affix-re; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | the act persisting where it does not fit \u2014 carried on past its context (appears only in -ant and -ation forms in the chapter's canon) | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=affix-irre; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | the state of the act fitting its context | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=affix-ant; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | the continuing state of the activity as a whole | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=affix-ation; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | levate published by Bohm · p. 44; canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-levate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “levate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. Source-record defect: its quoted excerpt shows “to relevate”, not the unprefixed form asserted here. The actual canon list on pp. 50-51 supplies the missing evidence. - CONFIRMED | re-levate published by Bohm · p. 44; canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-levate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-levate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-levant published by Bohm · pp. 44–45; canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-levant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-levant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-levant published by Bohm · pp. 44–45; canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-levant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-levant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | levation published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-levation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “levation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. Source-record defect: its quoted excerpt shows “re-levation”, not the unprefixed form asserted here. The actual canon list on pp. 50-51 supplies the missing evidence. - CONFIRMED | re-levation published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-levation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-levation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-levation published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-levation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-levation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | vidate published by Bohm · p. 46; canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-vidate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “vidate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-vidate published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-vidate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-vidate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-vidant published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-vidant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-vidant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-vidant published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-vidant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-vidant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | vidation published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-vidation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “vidation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. Source-record defect: its quoted excerpt shows “Re-vidation”, not the unprefixed form asserted here. The actual canon list on pp. 50-51 supplies the missing evidence. - CONFIRMED | re-vidation published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-vidation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-vidation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-vidation published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-vidation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-vidation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | di-vidate published by Bohm · p. 47; canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-di-vidate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “di-vidate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-dividate published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-dividate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-dividate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-dividant published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-dividant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-dividant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-dividant published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-dividant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-dividant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | di-vidation published by Bohm · pp. 48, 50–51, 54 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-di-vidation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “di-vidation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-dividation published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-dividation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-dividation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-dividation published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-dividation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-dividation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | ordinate published by Bohm · p. 49; canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-ordinate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “ordinate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-ordinate published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-ordinate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-ordinate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-ordinant published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-ordinant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-ordinant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-ordinant published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-ordinant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-ordinant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | ordination published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-ordination; The full chapter contains the standalone form “ordination” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. Source-record defect: its quoted excerpt shows “re-ordination”, not the unprefixed form asserted here. The actual canon list on pp. 50-51 supplies the missing evidence. - CONFIRMED | re-ordination published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-ordination; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-ordination” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-ordination published by Bohm · canon list pp. 50–51 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-ordination; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-ordination” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | verrate published by Bohm · p. 54 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-verrate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “verrate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-verrate published by Bohm · p. 54 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-verrate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-verrate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-verrant published by Bohm · p. 54 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-verrant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-verrant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-verrant published by Bohm · p. 54 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-verrant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-verrant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | verration published by Bohm · p. 54 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-verration; The full chapter contains the standalone form “verration” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-verration published by Bohm · pp. 54–55 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-verration; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-verration” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-verration published by Bohm · p. 54 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-verration; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-verration” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | factate published by Bohm · p. 55 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-factate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “factate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-factate published by Bohm · pp. 55–56 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-factate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-factate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-factant published by Bohm · pp. 55–56 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-factant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-factant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-factant published by Bohm · pp. 55–56 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-factant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-factant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | con-statate published by Bohm · p. 57 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-con-statate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “con-statate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-constatate published by Bohm · pp. 57–58 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-constatate; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-constatate” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-constatant published by Bohm · pp. 57–58 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-constatant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-constatant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | irre-constatant published by Bohm · pp. 57–58 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-irre-constatant; The full chapter contains the standalone form “irre-constatant” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | re-constatation published by Bohm · p. 58 | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=published-re-constatation; The full chapter contains the standalone form “re-constatation” at the stated page/passage; it is also in the 44-entry regular inventory. Independently checked with token boundaries rather than accepting a match inside a longer prefixed word. The engine regenerates it exactly. - CONFIRMED | Printed at p. 57 as “The noun form ‘re-constation’”, while p. 58 prints “re-constatation” \u2014 an inconsistency in the book itself, verified in both independent scans; the Routledge Classics index reads “constatate/ion 57”. The engine regenerates the regular p. 58 form and records this one. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=variant-re-constation; The full chapter has both the irregular re-constation (p. 57) and regular re-constatation (p. 58); the recorded note correctly treats the first as a printed variant. - CONFIRMED | Appears once unhyphenated alongside di-vidation (pp. 48, 50–51, 54); both spellings are in the printed text. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=variant-dividation; Read the single unhyphenated dividation appearance at p. 48 in context; the surrounding family also uses di-vidation. - CONFIRMED | Inflected verb form. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=variant-re-levates; The inflected re-levates is printed at p. 47; its existence does not add a new regular derivation slot. - CONFIRMED | Inflected verb forms. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=variant-re-constatates-re-constatated; The inflected re-constatates and re-constatated occur at p. 58; read in sentence context. - CONFIRMED | Later chapters use unhyphenated relevate / relevated / relevates / relevating (ch. 6, pp. 191–198) and coin synordinate / asynordinate (p. 194). These are Bohm’s own later usage, outside the ch. 2 canon this engine regenerates. | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=later-usage-note; The full book's later chapter 6 contains unhyphenated relevate and its inflections and the terms synordinate/asynordinate, outside the chapter 2 regular inventory. Read the cited p. 194 passage and the pp. 191-198 context. - CONFIRMED | to carry the act again, for a particular context, as thought and language now point \u2014 lifting into attention, renewed | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=derived-meaning-re; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | the state of the renewed act fitting \u2014 it answers the context it is done in | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=derived-meaning-reant; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | the act persisting where it does not fit \u2014 carried on past its context | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=derived-meaning-irreant; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | the continuing state of the activity as a whole | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=derived-meaning-ation; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | the continuing state of the activity, freshly renewed in its context | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=derived-meaning-reation; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | the continuing state of the activity where it has ceased to fit | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=derived-meaning-irreation; Pages 44-45 define contextual renewal, fitting and non-fitting and continuing activity. The chapter explicitly requires the break in re-levate. The page's derived English meanings paraphrase those stipulations; the source was checked as semantics, not merely matching UI strings. - CONFIRMED | to lift a certain content into attention again, for a particular context, as indicated by thought and language (Bohm’s printed definition) | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=relevate-card-gloss; The p. 44 definition of re-levate says to lift content into attention again for a particular context, indicated by thought and language. - CONFIRMED | to lift up again; to lighten, relieve | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevant | id=etymology-relevant; Wiktionary gives relevo as lift up again/lighten/relieve and the re- + levo decomposition; Etymonline supplies the alternative route already disclosed on the page. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | relevant ← relevare = re- + levare, “to lift up again; to lighten, relieve” \u2014 so, read as an act: a lifting-again that fits. | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevant | id=etymon-relevant; Wiktionary gives relevo as lift up again/lighten/relieve and the re- + levo decomposition; Etymonline supplies the alternative route already disclosed on the page. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline glosses relevare “to lessen, lighten”; the literal “lift again” decomposition is Wiktionary’s. Same levare as in lever and elevate. | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevant; https://www.etymonline.com/word/relevant | id=etymology-caveat-relevant; Etymonline's "to lessen, lighten" and Wiktionary's lift-up-again decomposition are both present. The connected words lever/elevate share the levare ancestry, as the linked etymological family shows. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline + Wiktionary \u2014 root agreed; route into English differs (French participle vs Scots legal Latin, early 1500s) | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevant | id=etymology-citation-relevant; Wiktionary gives early 1500s Scots legal borrowing from Latin relevans/relevantem, then general English, and relevo from re- plus levo. Etymonline instead gives the French route and "to lessen, lighten". The page openly records that disagreement; the metaphor about forgetting is not historical testimony. - CONFIRMED | to stretch toward (ad + tendere) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/attention | id=etymology-attention; Etymonline traces attention to attendere and ad- plus tendere (stretch); the stretching-toward gloss preserves the literal components. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | attention ← attendere, “to stretch toward (ad + tendere)” \u2014 so, read as an act: a stretching-toward. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/attention | id=etymon-attention; Etymonline traces attention to attendere and ad- plus tendere (stretch); the stretching-toward gloss preserves the literal components. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/attention | id=etymology-citation-attention; Etymonline traces attention to attendere and ad- plus tendere (stretch); the stretching-toward gloss preserves the literal components. - CONFIRMED | a thing done, a deed | https://www.etymonline.com/word/fact | id=etymology-fact; Etymonline gives factum/factus/facere, a thing done/deed, with the older criminal sense. The gloss and historical caveat agree. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | fact ← facere → factum, “a thing done, a deed” \u2014 so, read as an act: a thing-done. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/fact | id=etymon-fact; Etymonline gives factum/factus/facere, a thing done/deed, with the older criminal sense. The gloss and historical caveat agree. - CONFIRMED | In 16th–17th-century English, often specifically an evil deed \u2014 as in “after the fact”. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/fact | id=etymology-caveat-fact; Etymonline gives factum/factus/facere, a thing done/deed, with the older criminal sense. The gloss and historical caveat agree. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/fact | id=etymology-citation-fact; Etymonline gives factum/factus/facere, a thing done/deed, with the older criminal sense. The gloss and historical caveat agree. - CONFIRMED | to throw before, against (ob + iacere) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/object | id=etymology-object; Etymonline traces object through obiectum/obiectus to obicere and ob- plus iacere. Throwing before/against is an accurate compositional gloss. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | object ← obicere, “to throw before, against (ob + iacere)” \u2014 so, read as an act: the thrown-against. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/object | id=etymon-object; Etymonline traces object through obiectum/obiectus to obicere and ob- plus iacere. Throwing before/against is an accurate compositional gloss. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/object | id=etymology-citation-object; Etymonline traces object through obiectum/obiectus to obicere and ob- plus iacere. Throwing before/against is an accurate compositional gloss. - CONFIRMED | to throw or place under (sub + iacere) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/subject | id=etymology-subject; Etymonline gives subicere/subiicere as placing or throwing under, from sub- plus iacere. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | subject ← subicere, “to throw or place under (sub + iacere)” \u2014 so, read as an act: the thrown-under. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/subject | id=etymon-subject; Etymonline gives subicere/subiicere as placing or throwing under, from sub- plus iacere. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/subject | id=etymology-citation-subject; Etymonline gives subicere/subiicere as placing or throwing under, from sub- plus iacere. - CONFIRMED | to take in and hold, to conceive (con + capere, to grasp) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept | id=etymology-concept; Etymonline gives concipere as take in and hold/become pregnant, with capere. Its con- may be intensive. "Seizing-together" is expressly introduced on the page as an imaginative reading as an act, not an exact dictionary quotation. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | concept ← concipere, “to take in and hold, to conceive (con + capere, to grasp)” \u2014 so, read as an act: a seizing-together. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept | id=etymon-concept; Etymonline gives concipere as take in and hold/become pregnant, with capere. Its con- may be intensive. "Seizing-together" is expressly introduced on the page as an imaginative reading as an act, not an exact dictionary quotation. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept | id=etymology-citation-concept; Etymonline gives concipere as take in and hold/become pregnant, with capere. Its con- may be intensive. "Seizing-together" is expressly introduced on the page as an imaginative reading as an act, not an exact dictionary quotation. - CONFIRMED | to cut off (de + caedere, to cut) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/decision | id=etymology-decision; Etymonline gives decidere, literally to cut off, from de- plus caedere. The gloss and cutting-off metaphor preserve that history. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | decision ← decidere, “to cut off (de + caedere, to cut)” \u2014 so, read as an act: a cutting-off. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/decision | id=etymon-decision; Etymonline gives decidere, literally to cut off, from de- plus caedere. The gloss and cutting-off metaphor preserve that history. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/decision | id=etymology-citation-decision; Etymonline gives decidere, literally to cut off, from de- plus caedere. The gloss and cutting-off metaphor preserve that history. - CONFIRMED | to bound, to limit completely (de + finire) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/definition | id=etymology-definition; Etymonline gives definire as limiting/bounding from de- plus finire, and finire from the noun finis. The reverse nominal layer is correctly disclosed. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | definition ← definire, “to bound, to limit completely (de + finire)” \u2014 so, read as an act: a bounding. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/definition | id=etymon-definition; Etymonline gives definire as limiting/bounding from de- plus finire, and finire from the noun finis. The reverse nominal layer is correctly disclosed. - CONFIRMED | finire itself sits on the noun finis, “boundary” \u2014 a verb layer resting on a noun. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/definition | id=etymology-caveat-definition; Etymonline gives definire as limiting/bounding from de- plus finire, and finire from the noun finis. The reverse nominal layer is correctly disclosed. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/definition | id=etymology-citation-definition; Etymonline gives definire as limiting/bounding from de- plus finire, and finire from the noun finis. The reverse nominal layer is correctly disclosed. - CONFIRMED | to stand forth, emerge, appear (ex + sistere) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/existence | id=etymology-existence; Etymonline gives exsistere/existere as stand forth, arise, appear, with ex- and sistere. The gloss is a translation of those components. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | existence ← exsistere, “to stand forth, emerge, appear (ex + sistere)” \u2014 so, read as an act: a standing-forth. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/existence | id=etymon-existence; Etymonline gives exsistere/existere as stand forth, arise, appear, with ex- and sistere. The gloss is a translation of those components. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/existence | id=etymology-citation-existence; Etymonline gives exsistere/existere as stand forth, arise, appear, with ex- and sistere. The gloss is a translation of those components. - CONFIRMED | to ask, to seek | https://www.etymonline.com/word/question | id=etymology-question; Etymonline gives quaestionem as a noun of action from quaerere, "ask, seek". The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | question ← quaerere, “to ask, to seek” \u2014 so, read as an act: a seeking. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/question | id=etymon-question; Etymonline gives quaestionem as a noun of action from quaerere, "ask, seek". - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/question | id=etymology-citation-question; Etymonline gives quaestionem as a noun of action from quaerere, "ask, seek". - CONFIRMED | to see (Greek; whence idea, “the look of a thing”) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/idea | id=etymology-idea; Etymonline traces Greek idea, the form/look of a thing, to idein, "to see". The thawed expression is the page's interpretive gloss, not an assertion that idein is a past participle. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | idea ← idein, “to see (Greek; whence idea, “the look of a thing”)” \u2014 so, read as an act: a having-been-seen. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/idea | id=etymon-idea; Etymonline traces Greek idea, the form/look of a thing, to idein, "to see". The thawed expression is the page's interpretive gloss, not an assertion that idein is a past participle. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/idea | id=etymology-citation-idea; Etymonline traces Greek idea, the form/look of a thing, to idein, "to see". The thawed expression is the page's interpretive gloss, not an assertion that idein is a past participle. - CONFIRMED | to look at, behold, contemplate | https://www.etymonline.com/word/theory | id=etymology-theory; Etymonline traces theory to theoria/theorein through the noun theoros, spectator. The verbal layer and the earlier noun layer both agree with the page. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | theory ← theōrein, “to look at, behold, contemplate” \u2014 so, read as an act: a beholding. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/theory | id=etymon-theory; Etymonline traces theory to theoria/theorein through the noun theoros, spectator. The verbal layer and the earlier noun layer both agree with the page. - CONFIRMED | theōrein is itself built on the noun theōros, “spectator” \u2014 the freeze runs both ways. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/theory | id=etymology-caveat-theory; Etymonline traces theory to theoria/theorein through the noun theoros, spectator. The verbal layer and the earlier noun layer both agree with the page. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline (to gramma level) + Wiktionary | https://www.etymonline.com/word/theory | id=etymology-citation-theory; Etymonline traces theory to theoria/theorein through the noun theoros, spectator. The verbal layer and the earlier noun layer both agree with the page. - CONFIRMED | to feel, to perceive | https://www.etymonline.com/word/sentence | id=etymology-sentence; Etymonline gives sententia/sentire, feeling or perceiving, and the older judgment/opinion sense. The judicial-sentence connection is preserved. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | sentence ← sentire, “to feel, to perceive” \u2014 so, read as an act: a way-of-feeling. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/sentence | id=etymon-sentence; Etymonline gives sententia/sentire, feeling or perceiving, and the older judgment/opinion sense. The judicial-sentence connection is preserved. - CONFIRMED | The judge’s “sentence” preserves the older sense: an opinion felt and delivered. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/sentence | id=etymology-caveat-sentence; Etymonline gives sententia/sentire, feeling or perceiving, and the older judgment/opinion sense. The judicial-sentence connection is preserved. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/sentence | id=etymology-citation-sentence; Etymonline gives sententia/sentire, feeling or perceiving, and the older judgment/opinion sense. The judicial-sentence connection is preserved. - CONFIRMED | to drag away (abs + trahere) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/abstract | id=etymology-abstract; Etymonline gives abstrahere from abs- plus trahere, dragging away. The page accurately glosses the components. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | abstract ← abstrahere, “to drag away (abs + trahere)” \u2014 so, read as an act: the dragged-away. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/abstract | id=etymon-abstract; Etymonline gives abstrahere from abs- plus trahere, dragging away. The page accurately glosses the components. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/abstract | id=etymology-citation-abstract; Etymonline gives abstrahere from abs- plus trahere, dragging away. The page accurately glosses the components. - CONFIRMED | to try, to test (kin to peril and expert) | https://www.etymonline.com/word/experiment | id=etymology-experiment; Etymonline gives experiri as try/test and its relationship to experience/expert and the root also behind peril. The record labels this a quote, but the UI uses quotation marks for a translated word-sense with explanatory components; it is not word-for-word dictionary prose. - CONFIRMED | experiment ← experiri, “to try, to test (kin to peril and expert)” \u2014 so, read as an act: a trying-out. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/experiment | id=etymon-experiment; Etymonline gives experiri as try/test and its relationship to experience/expert and the root also behind peril. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/experiment | id=etymology-citation-experiment; Etymonline gives experiri as try/test and its relationship to experience/expert and the root also behind peril. - CONFIRMED | Old English þing meant assembly, council \u2014 the deliberative meeting (Iceland’s parliament is still the Alþingi). A frozen parliament, not a frozen act: the deeper verb link is speculative and both sources treat the origin as nominal. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/thing | id=etymology-thing; Etymonline gives Old English þing as meeting/assembly and the Alþingi example; a deeper etymology involving stretching/time is tentative. The page preserves that uncertainty. The source record's Etymonline URL was unreadable automatically but its entry was opened manually. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline + Wiktionary | https://www.etymonline.com/word/thing | id=etymology-citation-thing; Etymonline gives Old English þing as meeting/assembly and the Alþingi example; a deeper etymology involving stretching/time is tentative. The page preserves that uncertainty. The source record's Etymonline URL was unreadable automatically but its entry was opened manually. - CONFIRMED | Latin lingua: the tongue \u2014 the organ, standing by metonymy for the speech it makes. A frozen body part, not a frozen act. | https://www.etymonline.com/word/language | id=etymology-language; Etymonline traces language through French to Latin lingua, "tongue". The frozen-organ description is an interpretive metaphor for this nominal source. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline | https://www.etymonline.com/word/language | id=etymology-citation-language; Etymonline traces language through French to Latin lingua, "tongue". The frozen-organ description is an interpretive metaphor for this nominal source. - CONFIRMED | Latin nomen, “name” \u2014 a noun all the way down to Proto-Indo-European *h₁nómn̥. The tempting link to gnoscere, “to know”, is a documented false association. | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/nomen?oldid=0 | id=etymology-noun; The Wiktionary nomen entry identifies the inherited Indo-European noun and calls the connection with gnoscere a false association. The entry was read successfully. - CONFIRMED | Etymonline + Wiktionary | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/nomen?oldid=0 | id=etymology-citation-noun; The Wiktionary nomen entry identifies the inherited Indo-European noun and calls the connection with gnoscere a false association. The entry was read successfully. - CONFIRMED | 'relevant' really does descend from Latin relevare, to lift up again | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevant | id=frontmatter-relevant; Wiktionary gives early 1500s Scots legal borrowing from Latin relevans/relevantem, then general English, and relevo from re- plus levo. Etymonline instead gives the French route and "to lessen, lighten". The page openly records that disagreement; the metaphor about forgetting is not historical testimony. - CONFIRMED | The ablaut series are English's oldest verbs still moving inside their own vowels \u2014 the living fossil of a morphology that conjugated by flowing. | https://users.pfw.edu/dfleming/_HEL2022/HejnaWalkden_HEL_Germanic.pdf | id=nearby-ablaut; Hejna/Walkden section 7.3.2 documents inherited strong-verb vowel alternation in Old English and its Germanic ancestry. The nearby-link text is a metaphorical description of this inherited morphology, not a ranking of individually dated English lexemes. - CONFIRMED | Zhuangzi's butterfly dream ends in 'the transformation of things' \u2014 wu hua, things as phases of one changing. | https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/zhuang-zhou-zhuangzi | id=nearby-zhuangzi; Legge's Zhuangzi butterfly passage ends "the Transformation of Things". The following phrase is the page's interpretation of wu hua, not a second quotation. - CONFIRMED | Benjamin Lee Whorf wrote that Hopi contains “no words, grammatical forms, construction[s] or expressions that refer directly to what we call ‘time.’” | https://archive.org/download/languagethoughtr00whor/languagethoughtr00whor_djvu.txt | id=whorf-no-time; Read Whorf p. 57 in the full Carroll-edited collection. The sentence is present. The bracketed s and altered closing punctuation are overt editorial presentation, with no substantive change to the quoted assertion. - CONFIRMED | Ekkehart Malotki’s Hopi Time (1983) \u2014 six hundred pages of fieldwork | https://www.rexresearch1.com/HopiLanguageLibrary/HopiTimeMalotki.pdf | id=malotki-date-length; The scan is copyright 1983, with 677 numbered pages including bibliography; the main discussion extends beyond 600 pages. "Six hundred pages" is a rounded description of scale rather than a claimed exact bibliographic extent. The supplied excerpt accurately labels the final Bibliography page 677; it does not claim the bibliography starts there. - CONFIRMED | a Hopi sentence glossed “then indeed, the following day, quite early in the morning at the hour when people pray to the sun…” | https://www.rexresearch1.com/HopiLanguageLibrary/HopiTimeMalotki.pdf | id=malotki-opening-quote; Read the opening epigraph in the complete scan. The English gloss contains the quoted wording and continues to a past event in which he woke the girl again. The ellipsis is correctly signaled. - CONFIRMED | “no words for time” (it has plenty) | https://www.rexresearch1.com/HopiLanguageLibrary/HopiTimeMalotki.pdf | id=hopi-plenty-time; Malotki's temporal vocabulary, constructions and tense analysis directly support the limited correction that Hopi has abundant ways to refer to time. - CONFIRMED | Whorf’s defenders reply that his deeper target was how time is grammatically packaged, not whether Hopi speakers can say “tomorrow” \u2014 but the version you have heard, “the Hopi have no concept of time,” is simply dead. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopi_time_controversy | id=hopi-defenders; The cited controversy overview attributes the grammatical-packaging objection to Whorf's defenders. Whorf's own broader passage distinguishes the Hopi view from the particular English concept of time. The page labels the absolute no-concept slogan as the popular version, not a faithful restatement of all Whorf's work. - CONFIRMED | Whorf 1936/1956 (Carroll ed., p. 57) | https://archive.org/download/languagethoughtr00whor/languagethoughtr00whor_djvu.txt | id=citation-whorf; The collection is edited by John B. Carroll in 1956; p. 57 carries the quotation and the essay note dates the manuscript approximately 1936 (publication was later). The slash date is appropriately composition/reprint, not a claim of publication in 1936. - CONFIRMED | Malotki 1983, epigraph & p. 624. | https://www.rexresearch1.com/HopiLanguageLibrary/HopiTimeMalotki.pdf | id=citation-malotki; Verified both locations: the epigraph contains the opening example; printed p. 624 discusses future -ni. The citation itself is correct even though the sentence it supports conflates those locations in claim 258. - CONFIRMED | Whorf's 'Hopi has no time' meets Malotki's six hundred pages of Hopi time. | https://www.rexresearch1.com/HopiLanguageLibrary/HopiTimeMalotki.pdf | id=frontmatter-malotki; The scan is copyright 1983, with 677 numbered pages including bibliography; the main discussion extends beyond 600 pages. "Six hundred pages" is a rounded description of scale rather than a claimed exact bibliographic extent. The supplied excerpt accurately labels the final Bibliography page 677; it does not claim the bibliography starts there. - CONFIRMED | all 44 forms he published in chapter two | https://archive.org/download/bohm-wholeness-and-the-implicate-order/BOHM_Wholeness%20And%20The%20Implicate%20Order_djvu.txt | id=frontmatter-inventory-world; Hand tally against the chapter: four initial families of 7, verrate 7, factate 4 and con-statate 5 gives 28+7+4+5=44 regular forms. The chapter also contains the expressly disclosed irregular spellings and inflections. This supports the page's explained regular canon, not an inventory of every inflected token in the chapter. ## Findings - [fixed] X1 (WRONG): All 18 marked words receive the frozen class and dotted border. Both etymology arrays have 15 melting entries and three refusals: thing, language and noun. The instruction and empty-card prompt now allow the refusals; source glosses are unchanged. - [fixed] X2 (WRONG): The book copyright page dates first publication to 1980, and the archive catalogue dates the rheomode typescript to 1971. Neither is a century before 2026. The cited Sapir book is from 1921. The page now says the linguistic literature, without implying that all of it followed Bohm. - [fixed] X3 (WRONG): Sapir, Language, chapter V, concludes that every language distinguishes noun and verb, while allowing that the distinction may be elusive. Corrected the reversed attribution in the card and FIELD-CHECK.md. - [fixed] X4 (WRONG): Wojdak (2000), p. 269, quotes Swadesh p. 79: predication or non-predication depends on the word ending. The following examples use the same roots as predicates and arguments. Corrected the universal claim in the card and FIELD-CHECK.md; this finding does not settle the 1938/1939 bibliographic conflict. - [declined] X5 (MINOR): Braithwaite (2015), section 2.1, pp. 51-52, identifies Jacobsen's Makah analysis with -iq, then documents the Nuu-chah-nulth pattern with -ʔii. Inman, section 4, credits the article diagnostic to Jacobsen. The Nuu-chah-nulth suffix and phenomenon are supported; -ʔiː and -ʔii both indicate the long vowel. Triage Tier C: retain MINOR for the compressed attribution and leave the separate sentence unchanged. - [fixed] X6 (WRONG): The archive catalogue, supplement NCUACS 156/6/07, p. 15 (PDF page 71), places B.91/B.92 under 1971 and describes B.92 as a rheomode typescript. The book copyright page gives 1980 as first publication. Corrected the page and markdown invention/build-date copies to distinguish documented work by 1971 from book publication; the catalogue does not establish an exact invention date. public/og/rheomode.png and public/og-thumbs/rheomode.webp still carry the old 1980 chronology; image regeneration remains open pending a board note. The share image public/og/rheomode.png and its thumbnail were regenerated from the corrected dek by the directing instance on 2026-10-14 and inspected. - [declined] X7 (MINOR): Bohm, chapter 2, p. 35, proposes an experiment that may give insight rather than an established result from a brief exercise. Triage Tier C: retain MINOR for interpretive overstatement; no contrary experimental outcome was established and this separate sentence is unchanged. - [fixed] X8 (WRONG): Recounted both ground-truth arrays: 15 entries without refuses and three with refuses true. ETYMOLOGY.md independently gives 15 melting entries. Replaced twenty with fifteen in the check paragraph, sharing the correction with X11 and X12. - [declined] X9 (MINOR): The fourth card names grammatical-gender replication failures but its citation line has Winawer, Levinson, Chen and Boroditsky, with no Mickan/Schiefke/Stefanowitsch reference. Triage Tier C: retain MINOR for incomplete documentation, not a disproved replication result; the separate checking sentence is unchanged. - [open note:81816d] X10 (WRONG): The published verifier imports an absolute /opt Playwright path and reads absolute local dist and ground-truth paths. Its manifest excludes the ground-truth dataset. The direct verifier run exits 1 at ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND before any assertion. scripts/check-placard.mjs writes the disputed completeness sentence. Mandatory shared placard class: retain WRONG and hold under existing board note 81816d; no per-layer placard edit or correction line. - [fixed] X11 (WRONG): The 15 melting entries include relevant, which the dek already introduces. ETYMOLOGY.md calls the remainder 14 other melters. Replaced fifteen more with fourteen more, sharing the inventory correction with X8 and X12. - [fixed] X12 (WRONG): The repository and embedded etymology arrays agree on 15 melting entries and three refusals. Replaced twenty with fifteen in the description, Open Graph description and JSON-LD, sharing the inventory correction with X8 and X11. - [fixed] X13 (WRONG): The catalogue dates B.92 to 1971; 1980 is the book publication date. The plain frontmatter and its HTML metadata mirror now say documented by 1971 and published in the 1980 book. The surrounding dek, descriptions and header now identify 1980 as publication. Shares the invention-date correction with X6, including the unresolved old chronology in public/og/rheomode.png and public/og-thumbs/rheomode.webp; image regeneration remains open pending a board note. The share image public/og/rheomode.png and its thumbnail were regenerated from the corrected dek by the directing instance on 2026-10-14 and inspected. - [fixed] X14 (WRONG): Read and visually inspected Malotki's opening epigraph (PDF page 7): it ends with the girl being awakened, with taa-tay-na and no -ni. Printed p. 624 (PDF page 646) separately identifies -ni as a future marker. Corrected the surrounding prose to separate the two passages, preserving the quotation. - [declined] X15 (MINOR): Bohm, chapter 2, p. 60, describes a world view implied by the rheomode and a possible benefit from attending to language's pressures. This does not demonstrate an absolute grammatical prohibition. Triage Tier C: retain MINOR for philosophical overstatement, not a tested impossibility result; the separate related-page sentence is unchanged.