Any Way You Fall
Drill a straight tunnel clean through the Earth, step in, and let go — no air, no friction, nothing but gravity. You reach the far side in about forty-two minutes. Drill a different tunnel, one that misses the centre entirely, and drop again. Same forty-two minutes. Every straight tunnel keeps the same clock. Drag the mouths of the tunnel below and see.
Interactive Earth cross-section and gravity tunnel
Gravity felt on the way down: in a uniform Earth it climbs straight from zero at the centre to full strength at the surface.
The forty-two minutes is not a coincidence and it is not a heavy calculation once you see it. Inside a uniform ball of rock, only the mass below your feet pulls on you; the shell above cancels out (Newton proved this). That inner mass shrinks as you fall, so gravity weakens in exact proportion to how deep you are — pulling hardest at the surface, vanishing at the very centre. A force that pulls you back in proportion to your distance from the middle is the definition of simple harmonic motion: the same law as a mass on a spring, or a pendulum in a small swing. You don't fly past the centre and escape; you slow, stop exactly at the far mouth, and would fall back forever. And the period of that oscillation depends only on the planet — not on where you started, not on how long the tunnel is.
That last clause is the strange one, and it is worth dwelling on. A tunnel from pole to pole is nearly 12,700 km long. A tunnel between two cities a short hop apart is a stubby chord near the surface. The stone in the long tunnel has vastly farther to travel — but it also falls through a much steeper drop and reaches a much higher speed at the middle, and the two effects cancel exactly. Set the spread to anything you like above and read the transit time: it does not move. This is a cousin of the tautochrone — the curve on which a bead takes the same time to reach the bottom no matter where you release it. Here the equal-time property lives not in a special curve but in gravity's own shape inside a uniform world.
The real Earth is faster — and breaks the spell
Switch the model above to Realistic. The Earth is not uniform: it has a small, ferociously dense iron core. Because so much mass is packed near the middle, gravity does not fade away as you descend through the mantle — it actually holds near 9.8 m/s² almost the whole way down, and only collapses once you enter the core. Stronger pull for most of the trip means a quicker fall: the pole-to-pole tunnel now takes about 38 minutes, not 42. And the beautiful equal-time coincidence quietly dies — a shallow tunnel and a deep one no longer share a clock. The tidy answer was a gift of the uniform assumption; the real planet keeps its own, messier time. Both numbers below are integrated live in your browser from the same physics, and both are re-checked offline against the standard Earth model.
The check
Every number on this page is recomputed two ways: live in your browser as you drag, and offline in research/gravity-tunnel/verify.mjs (8/8 passing). The offline run integrates the equation of motion by Runge–Kutta and, for the realistic case, reads density from the PREM model (Dziewonski & Anderson, 1981) — checking first that its density profile returns Earth's true mass and surface gravity before trusting any fall time.
| Uniform Earth, diametric fall (analytic π·√(R³/GM)) | 42.17 min |
| Uniform Earth, spread of transit over all tunnels d = 0…0.95R | 2.98×10⁻¹³ min |
| PREM density → integrated Earth mass | 5.973×10²⁴ kg |
| PREM → mean density / surface gravity | 5514 kg/m³ · 9.82 m/s² |
| Realistic (PREM) diametric fall — matches Klotz 2015 (38.2 min) | 38.18 min |
| Realistic Earth, transit range over tunnels d = 0…0.9R | 38.18 → 41.51 min |
What's idealised, stated plainly. No real tunnel could exist — the interior is molten and under crushing pressure, and any actual shaft would need to cope with the planet's rotation (the Coriolis deflection would grind a moving stone against the tunnel wall unless the tunnel runs pole-to-pole). Air resistance is neglected; with air, a real capsule reaches a terminal speed and the trip takes far longer. The point is not an engineering proposal but a clean question with a clean, checkable answer. The PREM figure assumes a non-rotating tunnel and treats the density profile as exact.