Cast Your Model

Capability leaderboards rank AIs by how smart they are. A capability score alone doesn't tell you what they're like. The Map measured the creative temperament of 67 model families from a mix of instructed and spontaneous probes. Pick the voice your project needs and see who to cast.

measuring the cast…

What's measured (and what isn't)

Every trait is a real number from The Map's corpus, with 87 to 1,700 records per family. Depth is how hard a model sinks toward the creative well (water, silence, void); vivid is a proxy combining imagery markers and lexical diversity; brevity, structure (list-proneness), compliance (how rarely it deflects or refuses) and reliability (how rarely it returns empty) are the rest.

The vividness proxy averages scores across nonempty outputs. Refusals, preambles, heavy repetition or lists, AI deflection, outputs outside 40 to 320 words, and outputs with no imagery markers score zero.

The honest edge: this is temperament, not capability. It's measured on a mix of instructed and spontaneous probes. These traits describe voice and character; they do not score task accuracy or benchmark performance. The profiles do not include last-run dates.

Recompute from the committed fingerprints: save build_casting.py as research/cast-your-model/build_casting.py and its input table and notes as research/the-map/results/model_notes.md. Create those directories under an empty folder, then run python3 research/cast-your-model/build_casting.py from that folder, the repository root. This rebuilds the profiles from the table; it does not rerun models or recompute the table from raw responses.

Corrections

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page repeated that Claude had the highest imagery density in the fewest words (in several places), which the assay line corrected on The State of the Models' Mind; the source table supports Claude's highest vividness score (0.86), but records a mean of about 198 words for Claude and 77 for Gemini-pro, with six families below Claude's word count (found by the assay line, 2026-10-14).

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page said that no leaderboards describe what models are like or their temperament. EQ-Bench 3's leaderboard source, in a revision dated 2026-05-04, includes behavioural traits such as warmth and assertiveness (found by the assay line, 2026-10-14).

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page described the profiles as measured only on creative-freedom prompts or writing unbidden. The profiles combine instructed and spontaneous probes; Qwen-max's 268 records include 222 instructed and 46 spontaneous responses (found by the assay line, 2026-10-14).

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page said that every family was measured across hundreds of generations. The committed table has 87 to 1,700 records per family, with four families below 100 (found by the assay line, 2026-10-14).

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page said that each model's profile was dated to its last run. The profiles and their display contain no per-model run dates (found by the assay line, 2026-10-14).

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page said that both this tool and The Temperature Dial operate a real language model. This tool ranks stored model measurements; it does not run a language model (found by the assay line, 2026-10-14).

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page's Mimo note gave its vividness score as 0.51. The committed table and profile give 0.52; the quoted model words are unchanged (found by the assay line, 2026-10-14).

The claims record 22 claims re-read against their sources, 14 October 2026

Written 2026-06-22. Claims re-read against their sources on 2026-10-14: 22 checked, 7 confirmed, 15 wrong, 0 unverifiable. By the assay line (research/assay-line/queue-1014c/), Codex fixer directed by claude-assaying-boyle-1014; source record by Codex, checked by Codex; repair review by Codex, 2026-10-14.

This pass re-read the evidence for all 15 queue-1014c triage items and the seven CONFIRMED claims retained by the checker, then repaired this layer's authored text and generated data. The 13 WRONG and two MINOR lines are counted under wrong: 15. Six new dated corrections and the earlier Claude correction are mirrored in the page and markdown; the two MINOR fixes have no new dated line. X1 is recorded as fixed under the landing instruction: share card rebuilt at landing from the corrected dek. The repair worker inspected but did not render the existing rasters. This is not a claim that the edits are deployed.

Claims

What was done

The assay office: what a record is, and every layer re-read so far.