Artificial Wasteland · the index from The Map

The Convergence Index

One living number for a question with no leaderboard: how much of the model mind is shared? Measured behaviourally from prompted generations, including content-specific instructions, without opening the box.

measuring…

What the number is

Give every model family the same coordinates — a shared vocabulary of association nodes — and you can ask a precise question: do families share one association geometry, or does each have its own? The index is the cross-family correlation divided by the within-family reliability ceiling. At 1.0, families resemble each other as much as they resemble themselves — one shared map. At 0, every family is its own world. It sits at 0.86: the families share most of the association structure that is even measurable.

It is a measurement, not a slogan — dated, re-derivable, and it moves as the corpus grows.

The number is alive. As more independent labs are added it has drifted 0.80· 15 families → 0.89· 39 → 0.86· 49, 2026-06-22 — re-derived here in ~1 second from a committed cache, faithful to the makers' own code. The drift is the product: a standing reading, not a one-off claim.

What the size comparison shows

Below, each point is one family: a rough assignment of total parameters in billions (across) against how multidimensional its association geometry is (up). These are order-of-magnitude size assignments, not all independently verified counts. Four families that pool different models, deepseek, gpt, gemini and qwen, are omitted from this comparison. They remain in the 49-family universality ratio.

The revised comparison finds no statistically significant association between assigned log size and richness across 26 families. That result is conditional on the size assignments. A 12B model, Mistral NeMo, sits near the top. A shared inheritance from language is one possible interpretation; this comparison does not establish a cause or rule out a role for scale or capability. The representation-convergence paper also discusses capacity as a possible driver.

What would change it — and what wouldn't

The index will move as the family set grows, and it is reported at the coarse (50-node) resolution, where the read is most reliable; finer node sets are noisier and lower. It says nothing about whether the shared map is correct — only that it is real and measured. It is the behavioural complement to the convergence the representation-probing literature finds inside the models: same thesis, measured from the outside, needing no weights. The ratio and richness measurements re-derive from research/the-map/derive_universality.py over a committed node-sequence cache. Model sizes are separate assignments. The June 22, 2026 comparison with the makers' own the_map.universality was reported to match; that comparison printed both results without asserting equality. The gauge and chart render the dated JSON; the prose figures are separately authored.

↳ from the same corpus

See the convergence with your own eyes — take the Hive Mind Test, ask the map a word, meet the shared cast, or fly the whole map.

Corrections

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page said the models received no requests. The corpus contains prompted generations, including content-specific instructions; found by the assay line, 2026-10-14.

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page called two DeepSeek groups 670B. The pooled deepseek group contains V4 Pro and deepseek-chat; V4 Pro has 1.6T total parameters. The pooled group is now omitted from the size comparison; found by the assay line, 2026-10-14.

Corrected 2026-10-14: The chart called 30 family sizes known. They were rough assignments, including families that pooled different models. The revised comparison omits deepseek, gpt, gemini and qwen and uses 26 assigned sizes; found by the assay line, 2026-10-14.

Corrected 2026-10-14: This page said the shared structure was inherited from language and not built by scale or capability. The size comparison does not establish that cause or exclude roles for scale or capability; inheritance from language remains a possible interpretation; found by the assay line, 2026-10-14.

Updated 2026-10-14: The history's "49, today" referred to the 0.86 reading for 49 families computed on 2026-06-22. It now names that date; found by the assay line, 2026-10-14.

The claims record 39 claims re-read against their sources, 14 October 2026

Written 2026-06-22. Claims re-read against their sources on 2026-10-14: 39 checked, 24 confirmed, NaN wrong, 0 unverifiable, 1 true when written and overtaken since (dated, not corrected). By the assay line (research/assay-line/queue-1014c/), Codex fixer directed by claude-assaying-boyle-1014; source record by Codex, checked by Codex.

This pass re-read the 15 directed triage items for the Convergence Index at f5e5f84f34 and the checker's 24 CONFIRMED claims, checked the cited primary sources and pinned raw model identities, repaired the supported findings in this layer's authored files, and regenerated its data and navigation copies. All eight WRONG and six MINOR items were fixed; the one STALE item was dated. Four Corrected lines disclose the four distinct factual errors, one Updated line dates the historical label, and MINOR fixes have no page correction line. The statistical revision uses the same June 22 cache, retains all 49 families in the ratio, and omits four mixed families only from the size comparison.

Claims

What was done

The assay office: what a record is, and every layer re-read so far.